From: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] silence spinlock/rwlock uninitialized break_lock member warnings
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 02:01:37 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504090150520.2455@dragon.hyggekrogen.localhost> (raw)
Hi Andrew,
Any chance this patch could be added to -mm (and possibly mainline)?
It removes a bunch of warnings when building with gcc -W, like these:
include/linux/wait.h:82: warning: missing initializer
include/linux/wait.h:82: warning: (near initialization for `(anonymous).break_lock')
include/asm/rwsem.h:88: warning: missing initializer
include/asm/rwsem.h:88: warning: (near initialization for `(anonymous).break_lock')
so there's less to sift through when looking for real problems with this
patch applied.
I've been using it for a while with no ill effects.
This patch has surfaced previously, please see the lkml thread
"[RFC] spinlock_t & rwlock_t break_lock member initialization (patch seeking comments included)"
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
---
spinlock.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm2-orig/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h 2005-03-02 08:37:50.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm2/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h 2005-04-09 01:49:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -32,7 +32,13 @@ typedef struct {
#define SPINLOCK_MAGIC_INIT /* */
#endif
-#define SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (spinlock_t) { 1 SPINLOCK_MAGIC_INIT }
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+#define SPINLOCK_BREAK_INIT , 0
+#else
+#define SPINLOCK_BREAK_INIT /* */
+#endif
+
+#define SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED (spinlock_t) { 1 SPINLOCK_MAGIC_INIT SPINLOCK_BREAK_INIT }
#define spin_lock_init(x) do { *(x) = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED; } while(0)
@@ -182,7 +188,13 @@ typedef struct {
#define RWLOCK_MAGIC_INIT /* */
#endif
-#define RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED (rwlock_t) { RW_LOCK_BIAS RWLOCK_MAGIC_INIT }
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
+#define RWLOCK_BREAK_INIT , 0
+#else
+#define RWLOCK_BREAK_INIT /* */
+#endif
+
+#define RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED (rwlock_t) { RW_LOCK_BIAS RWLOCK_MAGIC_INIT RWLOCK_BREAK_INIT }
#define rwlock_init(x) do { *(x) = RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED; } while(0)
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-08 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-09 0:01 Jesper Juhl [this message]
2005-04-09 0:10 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-09 0:23 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.62.0504090150520.2455@dragon.hyggekrogen.localhost \
--to=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®