From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pepoll_wait ...
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:40:34 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601172338530.4942@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060117210318.1f4212f0.akpm@osdl.org>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>> The attached patch implements the pepoll_wait system call, that extend
>>> the event wait mechanism with the same logic ppoll and pselect do. The
>>> definition of pepoll_wait is: [...]
>>
>> I definitely ACK this patch, it's needed for the same reasons we need
>> pselect and ppoll.
>>
>
> It busts most architectures.
>
> fs/eventpoll.c: In function `sys_pepoll_wait':
> fs/eventpoll.c:727: error: `TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> It seems that the preferred way to fix this is to sprinkle #ifdef
> TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK all over the code.
Hey, I've written in the comments that it depends on the
TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK bits ;) The latest one that dwmw posted used such
feature, so I though to align epoll bits to that too.
- Davide
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-18 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-18 3:36 Davide Libenzi
2006-01-18 4:20 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-01-18 5:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-18 7:13 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-18 7:40 ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
2006-01-18 7:48 ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-18 8:14 ` Davide Libenzi
2006-01-18 7:38 ` Davide Libenzi
2006-01-18 18:38 ` Michael Tokarev
2006-01-18 18:51 ` Davide Libenzi
2006-01-18 19:07 ` Ulrich Drepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0601172338530.4942@localhost.localdomain \
--to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®