mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pepoll_wait ...
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:51:04 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0601181050200.6878@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43CE8B14.4020909@tls.msk.ru>

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Michael Tokarev wrote:

> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>> 
>> The attached patch implements the pepoll_wait system call, that extend the 
>> event wait mechanism with the same logic ppoll and pselect do. The 
>> definition of pepoll_wait is:
>> 
>> int pepoll_wait(int epfd, struct epoll_event *events, int maxevents,
>>                 int timeout, const sigset_t *sigmask, size_t sigsetsize);
>
> How about epoll_pwait() instead?  It looks more appropriate, for
> my eyes anyway.  (Just a name, nothing more)

Thinking about it, it looks netter for me too. I'll change it if there are 
no other objections ...



- Davide



  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-18 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-18  3:36 Davide Libenzi
2006-01-18  4:20 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-01-18  5:03   ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-18  7:13     ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-18  7:40     ` Davide Libenzi
2006-01-18  7:48       ` David Woodhouse
2006-01-18  8:14         ` Davide Libenzi
2006-01-18  7:38   ` Davide Libenzi
2006-01-18 18:38 ` Michael Tokarev
2006-01-18 18:51   ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
2006-01-18 19:07   ` Ulrich Drepper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0601181050200.6878@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®