mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerhard Mack <gmack@innerfire.net>
To: Nauman Tahir <nauman.tahir@gmail.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ia_64_bit Performance difference
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:11:41 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512271105130.2104@innerfire.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0309ff0512270010g39d42f83rf9da794f455854a5@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Nauman Tahir wrote:
> On 12/27/05, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 12:18 +0500, Nauman Tahir wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > I have written a block device driver. Driver includes the
> > > implementation of write back cache policy. Purpose of the driver is
> > > not an issue. The problem I am facing is the considerable difference
> > > of performance when I run same driver on 32 and 64 BIT OS. I am
> > > testing the driver on 64 Bit Machine and run the same driver on both
> > > (32 and 64 Bit) OS. On 32 Bit, IO rate is almost double then on 64 Bit
> > > OS. ( i wish it could have been opposite :( )
> >
> > you forgot to post the URL to your source code...
> 
> I did NOT FORGET to post the URL of my code as I mentioned I am
> interested in general
> areas of the kernel to look for. Like is there any problem related to
> 64 bit specific kernel compilation etc...
> 
> You should ask for my system configurations. As far as the code is
> concered there is not any architecture specific issue I guess in that.
> I have used threads of MD as my generic thread library and have used
> calculations based on unsigned long.
> 
> Kernel Version:
> I am using is 2.6.9 and onwards.
> 
> Machine configuration is :
> HP Prolient DL 145 (Dual Opteron 244 Processors with 14GB RAM)

Opteron is not ia_64 it's X86_64.  ia_64 is Itanuim.

	Gerhard




--
Gerhard Mack

gmack@innerfire.net

<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-27 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-27  7:18 Nauman Tahir
2005-12-27  7:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-27  8:10   ` Nauman Tahir
2005-12-27  8:45     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-27 12:40     ` Roland Dreier
2005-12-27 15:10     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-12-27 16:11     ` Gerhard Mack [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0512271105130.2104@innerfire.net \
    --to=gmack@innerfire.net \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nauman.tahir@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®