mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nauman Tahir <nauman.tahir@gmail.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ia_64_bit Performance difference
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:10:16 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0309ff0512270010g39d42f83rf9da794f455854a5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1135669831.2926.11.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

On 12/27/05, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 12:18 +0500, Nauman Tahir wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I have written a block device driver. Driver includes the
> > implementation of write back cache policy. Purpose of the driver is
> > not an issue. The problem I am facing is the considerable difference
> > of performance when I run same driver on 32 and 64 BIT OS. I am
> > testing the driver on 64 Bit Machine and run the same driver on both
> > (32 and 64 Bit) OS. On 32 Bit, IO rate is almost double then on 64 Bit
> > OS. ( i wish it could have been opposite :( )
>
> you forgot to post the URL to your source code...

I did NOT FORGET to post the URL of my code as I mentioned I am
interested in general
areas of the kernel to look for. Like is there any problem related to
64 bit specific kernel compilation etc...

You should ask for my system configurations. As far as the code is
concered there is not any architecture specific issue I guess in that.
I have used threads of MD as my generic thread library and have used
calculations based on unsigned long.

Kernel Version:
I am using is 2.6.9 and onwards.

Machine configuration is :
HP Prolient DL 145 (Dual Opteron 244 Processors with 14GB RAM)

Regards

Nauman

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-27  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-27  7:18 Nauman Tahir
2005-12-27  7:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-27  8:10   ` Nauman Tahir [this message]
2005-12-27  8:45     ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-27 12:40     ` Roland Dreier
2005-12-27 15:10     ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-12-27 16:11     ` Gerhard Mack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f0309ff0512270010g39d42f83rf9da794f455854a5@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nauman.tahir@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®