From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Linux XFS Tuning & Linux I/O Scheduler
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 05:28:35 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606020527320.12421@p34> (raw)
Hello all,
So far I have been following:
http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1479435
For tuning XFS; are there any other parameters or methods of
tuning/optimization that are available to the end user?
Furthermore, I was wondering if anyone has tested
CFQ,Deadline,Anticipatory,noop with XFS which did they find the best?
Thanks,
Justin.
reply other threads:[~2006-06-02 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0606020527320.12421@p34 \
--to=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®