mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Olson <olson@pathscale.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@serpentine.com>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3)
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:37:07 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611070934570.25925@topaz.pathscale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m18xinb1qn.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
| Huh?  As I read the ipath code I am passing you the value that needs to go
| into ipath->int_config and thus into dd->ipath_kregs->kr_interrupt_config.

Yes.

| Sure it is coming as 2 32bit words instead of a one big 64 bit one, but
| that is simple to fix.

It would be cleaner, but not absolutely necessary.

| If your card doesn't pay attention to configuration space access cycles then
| there should be no reason to write the value there.   If your card does pay
| attention to the configuration space access cycles it should be trivial to
| make this work.

The card does pay attention, and other programs such as lspci and the
like also look at the config space.  They should definitely be kept
in sync, and config writes are fairly cheap, anyway.

| If you really need to write to both the config space registers and your
| magic shadow copy of the register I can certainly do the config space
| writes for you.  I just figured it would be more efficient not to.

The HT layer should always do the config updates, since you are trying
to clean up that layer.  Only the "extra" stuff (if any) should be done by
the callback.

Dave Olson
dave.olson@qlogic.com

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-07 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-31  4:27 Linux 2.6.19-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2006-10-31  5:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-31 14:43   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-10-31 16:44     ` Linux 2.6.19-rc4: udev compatibility broken? Mark Lord
2006-10-31 15:55   ` Linux 2.6.19-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2006-10-31 16:14     ` Martin J. Bligh
2006-10-31 16:34       ` Ray Lee
2006-10-31 16:51         ` Dave Jones
2006-10-31 21:26           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-31 22:39             ` Al Viro
2006-11-02 16:03               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-31 20:53         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-10-31 21:29           ` Al Viro
2006-11-01  6:33           ` Willy Tarreau
2006-11-01 20:26             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-11-01 21:04               ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-11-02 21:19                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2006-10-31 18:33       ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 18:36         ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-31 18:54           ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 18:45       ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 19:26       ` Russell King
2006-10-31 19:39         ` Martin Bligh
2006-10-31 17:02 ` CONFIG_USB_USBNET and mii_* (was Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4) Athanasius
2006-10-31 17:11   ` Randy Dunlap
2006-10-31 19:56 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 20:11   ` Greg KH
2006-11-04  3:15     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-10-31 20:12   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-31 20:21     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-02 20:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-11-02 20:10     ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-02 21:22       ` Auke Kok
2006-11-02 21:55       ` Alan Cox
2006-11-02 20:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-11-02 21:29       ` Greg KH
2006-11-02 21:26     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-02 21:40       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-10-31 20:08 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known regressions with patches Adrian Bunk
     [not found] ` <20061103024132.GG13381@stusta.de>
2006-11-03  2:56   ` [discuss] Linux 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v2) Dave Jones
2006-11-03  8:25     ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2006-11-03 15:56       ` Dave Jones
2006-11-05 17:32         ` Christian
2006-11-05 20:04           ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06 17:35             ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-06 17:49               ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06  6:00           ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-06 15:43             ` Christian
2006-11-06 17:20               ` Dave Jones
2006-11-06 17:30                 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-06 17:37               ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-04 18:21   ` [linux-usb-devel] " Greg KH
     [not found] ` <20061105064801.GV13381@stusta.de>
2006-11-05 13:26   ` 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3) Michael S. Tsirkin
2006-11-05 13:57     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-05 15:17   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07  4:22     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-11-07  5:18       ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07  8:50         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 16:19           ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07 17:33             ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 17:37               ` Dave Olson [this message]
2006-11-07 18:20                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 20:30                   ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 20:51                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 21:01                       ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 21:35                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 21:41                           ` Dave Olson
2006-11-07 22:25                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 18:01               ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07 18:29                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-07 21:32               ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-07 22:00                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-08  5:14                   ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-11-08 11:11                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-05 15:22   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-11-06 12:48 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known regressions with patches (v2) Adrian Bunk
2006-11-07 13:30 ` 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v4) Adrian Bunk
     [not found] ` <200611070317.42230.earny@net4u.de>
     [not found]   ` <200611070041.28008.len.brown@intel.com>
     [not found]     ` <200611072105.50178.earny@net4u.de>
2006-11-08  8:36       ` [linux-pm] 2.6.19-rc4: known unfixed regressions (v3) Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0611070934570.25925@topaz.pathscale.com \
    --to=olson@pathscale.com \
    --cc=bos@serpentine.com \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®