From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: why are some of my patches being credited to other "authors"?
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 07:05:37 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612090656140.13654@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1165663793.1103.127.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > p.s. it's possible that this is all just a wild coincidence, of
> > course. stranger things have happened.
>
> ... or a genuine mistake.
sure, as i wrote above, i'm willing to accept that. but it still
leaves an open issue -- once one submits a patch, is there *any*
official feedback that one can look for to see if it's been
accepted/rejected/dropped on the floor/whatever?
at last count, i have eight patches in the queue. or do i? i have no
way of knowing. (actually, that's not entirely true -- one of the
patches was Ack'ed so i'm assuming it will go in eventually, but i
still have no idea when.)
but given that i'm trying to follow the kernel guidelines and keep
each submission as a logically-related chunk, in many cases, i have to
wait for one patch to be applied before i can submit the next one.
and, at the moment, there's no way of knowing what's going on.
rday
p.s. WRT to the example i described above, if it was a coincidence
that someone else submitted a duplicate patch to mine, i don't think
it's unreasonable to suggest that my submission should have been
replied to on the list with something like "this patch is a duplicate
of so-and-so's," rather than silently throwing it away.
a few seconds of that kind of courtesy seems a small price to pay to
let me avoid days of wondering what's happening.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-09 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-09 10:22 Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-09 11:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-12-09 12:05 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2006-12-09 12:39 ` Tim Schmielau
2006-12-09 13:16 ` Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-09 13:55 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-12-09 11:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-09 12:11 ` Robert P. J. Day
2006-12-09 21:40 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-10 5:09 ` Paul Mundt
2006-12-10 19:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-09 13:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-12-10 7:24 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0612090656140.13654@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®