* [PATCH] fix OOM killing of swapoff
@ 2007-01-05 20:35 Hugh Dickins
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Hugh Dickins @ 2007-01-05 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Nick Piggin, linux-kernel
These days, if you swapoff when there isn't enough memory, OOM killer
gives "BUG: scheduling while atomic" and the machine hangs: badness()
needs to do its PF_SWAPOFF return after the task_unlock (tasklist_lock
is also held here, so p isn't going to be freed: PF_SWAPOFF might get
turned off at any moment, but that doesn't really matter).
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
---
Will be needed in 2.6.19-stable too.
mm/oom_kill.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- 2.6.20-rc3/mm/oom_kill.c 2007-01-01 10:30:46.000000000 +0000
+++ linux/mm/oom_kill.c 2007-01-05 20:17:21.000000000 +0000
@@ -61,12 +61,6 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct
}
/*
- * swapoff can easily use up all memory, so kill those first.
- */
- if (p->flags & PF_SWAPOFF)
- return ULONG_MAX;
-
- /*
* The memory size of the process is the basis for the badness.
*/
points = mm->total_vm;
@@ -77,6 +71,12 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct
task_unlock(p);
/*
+ * swapoff can easily use up all memory, so kill those first.
+ */
+ if (p->flags & PF_SWAPOFF)
+ return ULONG_MAX;
+
+ /*
* Processes which fork a lot of child processes are likely
* a good choice. We add half the vmsize of the children if they
* have an own mm. This prevents forking servers to flood the
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-01-05 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-05 20:35 [PATCH] fix OOM killing of swapoff Hugh Dickins
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®