From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: "David M. Lloyd" <dmlloyd@flurg.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/5] signalfd v2 - signalfd core ...
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 07:45:13 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703080742220.7015@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1173364264.6891.3.camel@localhost>
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 17:21 -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > int signalfd_dequeue(int fd, siginfo_t *info, long timeo);
> >
> > The "fd" parameter must ba a signalfd file descriptor. The "info" parameter
> > is a pointer to the siginfo that will receive the dequeued signal, and
> > "timeo" is a timeout in milliseconds, or -1 for infinite.
> > The signalfd_dequeue function returns 0 if successfull.
>
> Does this support non-blocking mode? It doesn't seem to at my level of
> understanding anyway. If I use this with EPOLLET for example, I'd
> expect to get a single EPOLLIN when a signal arrives, which would
> indicate to me that I must call signalfd_dequeue() in a loop until I get
> EAGAIN in order to be sure I've consumed all the outstanding signals so
> that the edge-triggered notification can be "re-armed".
This patch, if you get a POLLIN, you have a signal to read for sure (well,
unless you another thread/task reads it before you - but that's just
somthing you have to take care). There is not explicit check for
O_NONBLOCK now, but a zero timeout would do exactly the same thing.
- Davide
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-08 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-08 1:21 Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 14:31 ` David M. Lloyd
2007-03-08 15:45 ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
2007-03-08 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 16:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 16:40 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-03-08 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 20:53 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-03-30 23:24 ` Denis Vlasenko
2007-03-08 17:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 19:21 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 19:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 20:48 ` Marko Macek
2007-03-08 21:03 ` Marko Macek
2007-03-09 20:22 ` Kent Overstreet
2007-03-08 19:34 ` Avi Kivity
2007-03-08 19:40 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 23:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-03-09 0:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-09 21:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 20:43 Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-08 21:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 21:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-08 22:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-08 22:59 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-08 23:05 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-03-09 0:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-03-09 1:16 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0703080742220.7015@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com \
--to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dmlloyd@flurg.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®