mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE/RFC] Really Fair Scheduler
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 16:47:33 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709021634370.1817@scrub.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1188694367.11196.42.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com>

Hi,

On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Daniel Walker wrote:

> Out of curiosity I was reviewing your patch .. Since you create
> kernel/sched_norm.c as a copy of kernel/sched_fair.c it was hard to see
> what had changed .. So I re-diffed your patch to eliminate
> kernel/sched_norm.c and just make the changes to kernel/sched_fair.c .. 

I mainly did it this way to avoid annoying conflicts. I also started with 
a copy where I threw out everything but a basic skeleton and than just 
copied the stuff I needed.

> > (1)	time = sum_{t}^{T}(time_{t})
> > (2)	weight_sum = sum_{t}^{T}(weight_{t})
> 
> I read your description, but I was distracted by this latex style
> notation .. Could you walk through in english what these two equation
> are doing ..

T is the number of tasks, so the first is the sum of the time every task 
gets over a period of time and the second is the sum of all weights of 
each task.

bye, Roman

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-02 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-31  2:05 Roman Zippel
2007-08-31  9:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-31 13:22   ` Roman Zippel
2007-08-31 13:55     ` Mike Galbraith
2007-09-01  4:35     ` Mike Galbraith
2007-08-31 10:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-31 13:19   ` Roman Zippel
2007-09-02  9:26     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-03  2:58       ` Roman Zippel
2007-09-06  3:03         ` Syren Baran
2007-09-01  6:48   ` Roman Zippel
2007-09-02  2:19     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-02 17:02       ` Roman Zippel
2007-09-02  0:52 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-02  7:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-02  8:40     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-02  9:59       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-02 15:16     ` Roman Zippel
2007-09-02 15:29       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-02 17:16         ` Roman Zippel
2007-09-02 19:21           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-07 15:35     ` Roman Zippel
2007-09-08  7:56       ` Mike Galbraith
2007-09-08  8:23         ` Mike Galbraith
2007-09-10 23:23         ` Roman Zippel
2007-09-11  6:18           ` Mike Galbraith
2007-09-11 11:28             ` Roman Zippel
2007-09-02 14:47   ` Roman Zippel [this message]
2007-09-02 15:00     ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-03 18:20       ` Roman Zippel
2007-09-03 21:06         ` Daniel Walker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0709021634370.1817@scrub.home \
    --to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®