From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] generic GPIO parameter API
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:23:50 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806091109120.21876@axis700.grange> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806052229.37143.david-b@pacbell.net>
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 02 June 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as far as I understand, the current GPIO API only presents very basic GPIO
> > functionality: direction and level reading and writing. Whereas many GPIO
> > controllers have many further configurable parameters: pull-ups and
> > pull-downs, drive strength, slew rate, etc.
>
> Not at all how I'd describe it. Those omitted mechanisms are part
> of pin configuration, in the same way as function multiplexing is.
> (That is, assigning a given pin for use as a GPIO, vs hooking it up
> to an I2C, MMC, SPI, LCD, I2S, or memory controller.)
Yes, on the one hand you're right, this belongs to pin-configuration. But,
otoh, will anyone ever want to change these parameters on non-generic
pins? And should this be allowed? Whereas for GPIOs it clearly makes a
sense - on a test-board you have a header with free-hanging GPIOs. How do
you want to configure them? This depends on what the user connects to them
and you don't necessarily want to modify your kernel to reconfigure them.
As for various difficulties - they should be solvable, I think. For
example, for GPIO pins, that can only be configured in groups - you just
first verify that the other GPIOs in this group are either free or
configured compatibly, or you fail. Of course these functions are
hardware-specific, so we let every specific driver handle them.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-09 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-02 17:22 Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-06-02 17:54 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-06-02 23:13 ` Ben Nizette
2008-06-03 6:42 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-06-03 7:32 ` Ben Nizette
2008-06-03 8:29 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-06-03 22:02 ` Ben Nizette
2008-06-06 5:29 ` David Brownell
2008-06-06 5:50 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-06-09 16:23 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski [this message]
2008-06-09 16:54 ` Mark Brown
2008-06-09 17:09 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-06-10 9:43 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0806091109120.21876@axis700.grange \
--to=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®