From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
linux390@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drivers/s390/cio/chsc_sch.c: Correct use of ! and &
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 22:05:47 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810042205090.19286@ask.diku.dk> (raw)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
In commit e6bafba5b4765a5a252f1b8d31cbf6d2459da337, a bug was fixed that
involved converting !x & y to !(x & y). The code below shows the same
pattern, and thus should perhaps be fixed in the same way. In particular,
the result of !scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw) & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND is
always just !scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw).
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@@ expression E; constant C; @@
(
!E & !C
|
- !E & C
+ !(E & C)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
drivers/s390/cio/chsc_sch.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -u -p a/drivers/s390/cio/chsc_sch.c b/drivers/s390/cio/chsc_sch.c
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/chsc_sch.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/chsc_sch.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int chsc_examine_irb(struct chsc_
{
int backed_up;
- if (!scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw) & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND)
+ if (!(scsw_stctl(&request->irb.scsw) & SCSW_STCTL_STATUS_PEND))
return -EIO;
backed_up = scsw_cstat(&request->irb.scsw) & SCHN_STAT_CHAIN_CHECK;
request->irb.scsw.cmd.cstat &= ~SCHN_STAT_CHAIN_CHECK;
next reply other threads:[~2008-10-04 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-04 20:05 Julia Lawall [this message]
2008-10-06 1:25 ` M. Asselstine
2008-10-06 10:52 ` Heiko Carstens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0810042205090.19286@ask.diku.dk \
--to=julia@diku.dk \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®