mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Songyang Li <leesongyang@outlook.com>
To: helgaas@kernel.org
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, leesongyang@outlook.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Cancel compilation restrictions on function pcie_clear_device_status
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:35:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <TY3P286MB2754F489000B7FA6F9CF19D8B4CD2@TY3P286MB2754.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240615212603.GA1157372@bhelgaas>

On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 16:26:03 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:14:32 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > I think all current any callers of pcie_clear_device_status() are also
> > > under CONFIG_PCIEAER, so I don't think this fixes a current problem.
> > > 
> > > As you point out, it might make sense to use
> > > pcie_clear_device_status() even without AER, but I think we should
> > > include this change at the time when we add such a use.
> > > 
> > > If I'm missing a use with the current kernel, let me know.
> > 
> > As far as I know, some PCIe device drivers, for example,
> > [net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c],[net/ethernet/atheros/atl1c/atl1c_main.c],
> > which use the following code to clear the device status register,
> > pcie_capability_write_word(tp->pdev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA,
> >                 PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_CED |
> >                 PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_NFED |
> >                 PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_FED |
> >                 PCI_EXP_DEVSTA_URD);
> > I think it may be more suitable to export the pcie_clear_device_status()
> > for use in the driver code.
> 
> If we want to use this from drivers, it would make sense to do
> something like this patch, and this patch could be part of a series to
> call it from the drivers.
> 
> But at the same time, we should ask whether drivers should be clearing
> this status themselves, or whether it should be done by the PCI core.

After careful consideration, I agree with your point of view.
I hold a viewpoint that it should be done by the PCI core,
rather than pcie drivers. I give up this patch, and then I have
gained a profound understanding of PCIe Core from this communication.
Thanks,

Songyang Li


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-17 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-11 15:15 Songyang Li
2024-06-11 22:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-12 15:15   ` Songyang Li
2024-06-12 20:14     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-15  3:13       ` Songyang Li
2024-06-15 21:26         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-17 13:35           ` Songyang Li [this message]
2024-06-17 16:31             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-06-23  3:28               ` Songyang Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=TY3P286MB2754F489000B7FA6F9CF19D8B4CD2@TY3P286MB2754.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM \
    --to=leesongyang@outlook.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®