From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: Send uevent for num_altmodes update
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:17:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/bRstJuBYaLz4PK@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210107034904.4112029-1-pmalani@chromium.org>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:49:04PM -0800, Prashant Malani wrote:
> Generate a change uevent when the "number_of_alternate_modes" sysfs file
> for partners and plugs is updated by a port driver.
>
> Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/usb/typec/class.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/class.c b/drivers/usb/typec/class.c
> index ebfd3113a9a8..8f77669f9cf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/class.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/class.c
> @@ -766,6 +766,7 @@ int typec_partner_set_num_altmodes(struct typec_partner *partner, int num_altmod
> return ret;
>
> sysfs_notify(&partner->dev.kobj, NULL, "number_of_alternate_modes");
> + kobject_uevent(&partner->dev.kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
Shouldn't the sysfs_notify() handle the "something has changed" logic
good enough for userspace, as obviously someone is polling on the thing
(otherwise we wouldn't be calling sysfs_notify...)
The kobject itself hasn't "changed", but rather an individual attribute
has changed. We don't want to create uevents for every individual sysfs
attribute changing values, do we?
What is preventing a normal "monitor the sysfs file" logic from working
here for anyone who wants to know that the alternate modes have changed?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-07 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-07 3:49 Prashant Malani
2021-01-07 9:17 ` Greg KH [this message]
2021-01-07 9:50 ` Prashant Malani
2021-01-07 10:57 ` Greg KH
2021-01-07 13:21 ` Greg KH
2021-01-09 22:28 ` [RFC] removing explicit #define DEBUG Tom Rix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/bRstJuBYaLz4PK@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bleung@chromium.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmalani@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®