Re: [PATCH v2] sched: pick_next_rt_entity(): checked list_entry

[Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 11:23:42AM -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 13:01:16 +0000
> Pietro Borrello <borrello@diag.uniroma1.it> wrote:
> 
> > index ed2a47e4ddae..c024529d8416 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> > @@ -1777,6 +1777,7 @@ static struct sched_rt_entity *pick_next_rt_entity(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> >  	BUG_ON(idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO);
> >  
> >  	queue = array->queue + idx;
> > +	SCHED_WARN_ON(list_empty(queue));
> 
> I wonder if we should make this:
> 
> 	if (SCHED_WARN_ON(list_empty(queue)))
> 		return NULL;
> 
> >  	next = list_entry(queue->next, struct sched_rt_entity, run_list);
> >  
> >  	return next;
> > @@ -1789,7 +1790,6 @@ static struct task_struct *_pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
> >  
> >  	do {
> >  		rt_se = pick_next_rt_entity(rt_rq);
> > -		BUG_ON(!rt_se);
> 
> 		if (unlikely(!rt_se))
> 			return NULL;

I think that's better than taking a digger in one of the subsequent macros.


Cheers,
Phil


> 
> -- Steve
> 
> >  		rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se);
> >  	} while (rt_rq);
> >  
>



--