* [PATCH] fs: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for SB_NOUSER
@ 2022-10-29 7:17 Gaosheng Cui
2022-10-31 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gaosheng Cui @ 2022-10-29 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: viro, dhowells, cuigaosheng1; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined, so changing most
significant bit to unsigned. The UBSAN warning calltrace like below:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/namespace.c:2330:33
left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x7d/0xa5
dump_stack+0x15/0x1b
ubsan_epilogue+0xe/0x4e
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1e7/0x20c
graft_tree+0x36/0xf0
do_add_mount+0x98/0x100
path_mount+0xbd6/0xd50
init_mount+0x6a/0xa3
devtmpfs_setup+0x47/0x7e
devtmpfsd+0x1a/0x50
kthread+0x126/0x160
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
</TASK>
Fixes: e462ec50cb5f ("VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags")
Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 85015e21b755..a68d5310be7b 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ extern int send_sigurg(struct fown_struct *fown);
#define SB_NOSEC (1<<28)
#define SB_BORN (1<<29)
#define SB_ACTIVE (1<<30)
-#define SB_NOUSER (1<<31)
+#define SB_NOUSER (1U<<31)
/* These flags relate to encoding and casefolding */
#define SB_ENC_STRICT_MODE_FL (1 << 0)
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fs: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for SB_NOUSER
2022-10-29 7:17 [PATCH] fs: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for SB_NOUSER Gaosheng Cui
@ 2022-10-31 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-31 13:56 ` cuigaosheng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2022-10-31 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gaosheng Cui; +Cc: viro, dhowells, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 03:17:45PM +0800, Gaosheng Cui wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ extern int send_sigurg(struct fown_struct *fown);
> #define SB_NOSEC (1<<28)
> #define SB_BORN (1<<29)
> #define SB_ACTIVE (1<<30)
> -#define SB_NOUSER (1<<31)
> +#define SB_NOUSER (1U<<31)
Let's mark all of the flags as unsigned instead of just one so that
we don't mix types. s_flags is already unsigned (although for some
reason long) already.
And while you touch this please add the proper whitespaces around the
shift operator everywhere.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fs: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for SB_NOUSER
2022-10-31 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2022-10-31 13:56 ` cuigaosheng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: cuigaosheng @ 2022-10-31 13:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: viro, dhowells, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel
> Let's mark all of the flags as unsigned instead of just one so that
> we don't mix types. s_flags is already unsigned (although for some
> reason long) already.
>
> And while you touch this please add the proper whitespaces around the
> shift operator everywhere.
Thanks for taking time to review this patch, I have made patch v2 and submit it.
On 2022/10/31 21:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Let's mark all of the flags as unsigned instead of just one so that
> we don't mix types. s_flags is already unsigned (although for some
> reason long) already.
>
> And while you touch this please add the proper whitespaces around the
> shift operator everywhere.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] fs: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for SB_NOUSER
@ 2023-04-24 3:00 Hao Ge
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hao Ge @ 2023-04-24 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: viro, brauner; +Cc: linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, gehao618, Hao Ge
Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined, so changing
significant bit to unsigned. The UBSAN warning calltrace like below:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/nsfs.c:306:32
left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc4+ #2
Call trace:
<TASK>
dump_backtrace+0x134/0x1e0
show_stack+0x2c/0x3c
dump_stack_lvl+0xb0/0xd4
dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
ubsan_epilogue+0xc/0x3c
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0xb0/0x14c
nsfs_init+0x4c/0xb0
start_kernel+0x38c/0x738
__primary_switched+0xbc/0xc4
</TASK>
Signed-off-by: Hao Ge <gehao@kylinos.cn>
---
include/linux/fs.h | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index c85916e9f7db..86ab23a05b61 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1069,19 +1069,19 @@ extern int send_sigurg(struct fown_struct *fown);
#define SB_NOATIME 1024 /* Do not update access times. */
#define SB_NODIRATIME 2048 /* Do not update directory access times */
#define SB_SILENT 32768
-#define SB_POSIXACL (1<<16) /* VFS does not apply the umask */
-#define SB_INLINECRYPT (1<<17) /* Use blk-crypto for encrypted files */
-#define SB_KERNMOUNT (1<<22) /* this is a kern_mount call */
-#define SB_I_VERSION (1<<23) /* Update inode I_version field */
-#define SB_LAZYTIME (1<<25) /* Update the on-disk [acm]times lazily */
+#define SB_POSIXACL (1U<<16) /* VFS does not apply the umask */
+#define SB_INLINECRYPT (1U<<17) /* Use blk-crypto for encrypted files */
+#define SB_KERNMOUNT (1U<<22) /* this is a kern_mount call */
+#define SB_I_VERSION (1U<<23) /* Update inode I_version field */
+#define SB_LAZYTIME (1U<<25) /* Update the on-disk [acm]times lazily */
/* These sb flags are internal to the kernel */
-#define SB_SUBMOUNT (1<<26)
-#define SB_FORCE (1<<27)
-#define SB_NOSEC (1<<28)
-#define SB_BORN (1<<29)
-#define SB_ACTIVE (1<<30)
-#define SB_NOUSER (1<<31)
+#define SB_SUBMOUNT (1U<<26)
+#define SB_FORCE (1U<<27)
+#define SB_NOSEC (1U<<28)
+#define SB_BORN (1U<<29)
+#define SB_ACTIVE (1U<<30)
+#define SB_NOUSER (1U<<31)
/* These flags relate to encoding and casefolding */
#define SB_ENC_STRICT_MODE_FL (1 << 0)
--
2.25.1
No virus found
Checked by Hillstone Network AntiVirus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-24 3:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-10-29 7:17 [PATCH] fs: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for SB_NOUSER Gaosheng Cui
2022-10-31 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-31 13:56 ` cuigaosheng
2023-04-24 3:00 Hao Ge
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®