mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86/cpu: replacing the open-coded shift with BIT(x)
@ 2022-11-01  6:09 Gaosheng Cui
  2022-11-01  8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gaosheng Cui @ 2022-11-01  6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, puwen, TonyWWang-oc,
	Jason, peterz, hca, mika.westerberg, mario.limonciello,
	cuigaosheng1, tony.luck, andrew.cooper3, pawan.kumar.gupta,
	rdunlap, jithu.joseph, chenyi.qiang, rafael.j.wysocki, paulmck
  Cc: linux-kernel

Replace the open-coded shift with BIT(x) for x86_power to make the
code a bit more self-documenting, and we will get a UBSAN issue in
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c, fix it.

The UBSAN warning calltrace like below:

UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c:138:25
left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 dump_stack_lvl+0x7d/0xa5
 dump_stack+0x15/0x1b
 ubsan_epilogue+0xe/0x4e
 __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1e7/0x20c
 show_cpuinfo+0x5ff/0x6d0
 seq_read_iter+0x116/0x5b0
 proc_reg_read_iter+0x45/0xc0
 vfs_read+0x2ee/0x3c0
 ksys_read+0xe1/0x130
 __x64_sys_read+0x23/0x30
 do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
 </TASK>

Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c     | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c   | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c   | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c    | 2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index 860b60273df3..75d82cad323a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -613,7 +613,7 @@ static void early_init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * c->x86_power is 8000_0007 edx. Bit 8 is TSC runs at constant rate
 	 * with P/T states and does not stop in deep C-states
 	 */
-	if (c->x86_power & (1 << 8)) {
+	if (c->x86_power & BIT(8)) {
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c
index 345f7d905db6..9910bb1d90fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void early_init_centaur(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32);
 #endif
-	if (c->x86_power & (1 << 8)) {
+	if (c->x86_power & BIT(8)) {
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c
index 21fd425088fe..dc473bfbf1b5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/hygon.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static void early_init_hygon(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * c->x86_power is 8000_0007 edx. Bit 8 is TSC runs at constant rate
 	 * with P/T states and does not stop in deep C-states
 	 */
-	if (c->x86_power & (1 << 8)) {
+	if (c->x86_power & BIT(8)) {
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 121c1c38162a..bbe86a2f3a43 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	 * It is also reliable across cores and sockets. (but not across
 	 * cabinets - we turn it off in that case explicitly.)
 	 */
-	if (c->x86_power & (1 << 8)) {
+	if (c->x86_power & BIT(8)) {
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
 	}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index 099b6f0d96bd..efa1d39c4f25 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 
 	seq_puts(m, "power management:");
 	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
-		if (c->x86_power & (1 << i)) {
+		if (c->x86_power & BIT(i)) {
 			if (i < ARRAY_SIZE(x86_power_flags) &&
 			    x86_power_flags[i])
 				seq_printf(m, "%s%s",
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c
index 05fa4ef63490..34a8a460f8f4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static void early_init_zhaoxin(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32);
 #endif
-	if (c->x86_power & (1 << 8)) {
+	if (c->x86_power & BIT(8)) {
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
 		set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: replacing the open-coded shift with BIT(x)
  2022-11-01  6:09 [PATCH] x86/cpu: replacing the open-coded shift with BIT(x) Gaosheng Cui
@ 2022-11-01  8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
  2022-11-01 11:29   ` cuigaosheng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2022-11-01  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gaosheng Cui
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, puwen, TonyWWang-oc,
	Jason, hca, mika.westerberg, mario.limonciello, tony.luck,
	andrew.cooper3, pawan.kumar.gupta, rdunlap, jithu.joseph,
	chenyi.qiang, rafael.j.wysocki, paulmck, linux-kernel

On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 02:09:45PM +0800, Gaosheng Cui wrote:
> Replace the open-coded shift with BIT(x) for x86_power to make the
> code a bit more self-documenting, and we will get a UBSAN issue in
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c, fix it.
> 
> The UBSAN warning calltrace like below:
> 
> UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c:138:25
> left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'

Same as to the other case; UBSAN is broken garbage, stop quoting it.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: replacing the open-coded shift with BIT(x)
  2022-11-01  8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2022-11-01 11:29   ` cuigaosheng
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: cuigaosheng @ 2022-11-01 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, hpa, puwen, TonyWWang-oc,
	Jason, hca, mika.westerberg, mario.limonciello, tony.luck,
	andrew.cooper3, pawan.kumar.gupta, rdunlap, jithu.joseph,
	chenyi.qiang, rafael.j.wysocki, paulmck, linux-kernel

> Same as to the other case; UBSAN is broken garbage, stop quoting it.

I have made patch v2 and submitted it, removed the UBSAN warning calltrace,
and merged the patch "x86/cpu: fix undefined behavior in bit shift for intel_detect_tlb"
with it. Thanks!

On 2022/11/1 16:48, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 02:09:45PM +0800, Gaosheng Cui wrote:
>> Replace the open-coded shift with BIT(x) for x86_power to make the
>> code a bit more self-documenting, and we will get a UBSAN issue in
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c, fix it.
>>
>> The UBSAN warning calltrace like below:
>>
>> UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c:138:25
>> left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
> Same as to the other case; UBSAN is broken garbage, stop quoting it.
>
> .

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-01 11:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-01  6:09 [PATCH] x86/cpu: replacing the open-coded shift with BIT(x) Gaosheng Cui
2022-11-01  8:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-11-01 11:29   ` cuigaosheng

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome