mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	john.ogness@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: fix deadlock when kernel panic
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:19:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YCJTrrirMlH7M5i7@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210206054124.6743-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

On Sat 2021-02-06 13:41:24, Muchun Song wrote:
> We found a deadlock bug on our server when the kernel panic. It can be
> described in the following diagram.
> 
> CPU0:                                         CPU1:
> panic                                         rcu_dump_cpu_stacks
>   kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus                      nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace
>     register_nmi_handler(crash_nmi_callback)      printk_safe_flush
>                                                     __printk_safe_flush
>                                                       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&read_lock)
>     // send NMI to other processors
>     apic_send_IPI_allbutself(NMI_VECTOR)
>                                                         // NMI interrupt, dead loop
>                                                         crash_nmi_callback
>   printk_safe_flush_on_panic
>     printk_safe_flush
>       __printk_safe_flush
>         // deadlock
>         raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&read_lock)
> 
> The register_nmi_handler() can be called in the __crash_kexec() or the
> crash_smp_send_stop() on the x86-64. Because CPU1 is interrupted by the
> NMI with holding the read_lock and crash_nmi_callback() never returns,
> CPU0 can deadlock when printk_safe_flush_on_panic() is called.
> 
> When we hold the read_lock and then interrupted by the NMI, if the NMI
> handler call nmi_panic(), it is also can lead to deadlock.
> 
> In order to fix it, we make read_lock global and rename it to
> safe_read_lock. And we handle safe_read_lock the same way in
> printk_safe_flush_on_panic() as we handle logbuf_lock there.

What about the following commit message? It uses imperative language
and explains that the patch just prevents the deadlock. It removes
some details. The diagram is better than many words.

<commit message>
printk_safe_flush_on_panic() caused the following deadlock on our server:

CPU0:                                         CPU1:
panic                                         rcu_dump_cpu_stacks
  kdump_nmi_shootdown_cpus                      nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace
    register_nmi_handler(crash_nmi_callback)      printk_safe_flush
                                                    __printk_safe_flush
                                                      raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&read_lock)
    // send NMI to other processors
    apic_send_IPI_allbutself(NMI_VECTOR)
                                                        // NMI interrupt, dead loop
                                                        crash_nmi_callback
  printk_safe_flush_on_panic
    printk_safe_flush
      __printk_safe_flush
        // deadlock
        raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&read_lock)

DEADLOCK: read_lock is taken on CPU1 and will never get released.

It happens when panic() stops a CPU by NMI while it has been in
the middle of printk_safe_flush().

Handle the lock the same way as logbuf_lock. The printk_safe buffers
are flushed only when both locks can be safely taken.

Note: It would actually be safe to re-init the locks when all CPUs were
      stopped by NMI. But it would require passing this information
      from arch-specific code. It is not worth the complexity.
      Especially because logbuf_lock and printk_safe buffers have been
      obsoleted by the lockless ring buffer.
</commit message>

> Fixes: cf9b1106c81c ("printk/nmi: flush NMI messages on the system panic")
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>

With an updated commit message:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

Best Regards,
Petr

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-09  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-06  5:41 Muchun Song
2021-02-08  6:38 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-02-08  8:49   ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-02-08 13:12     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-02-08 15:40       ` Muchun Song
2021-02-09  8:39         ` Petr Mladek
2021-02-10  2:25           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2021-02-09  9:19 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2021-02-09 12:20   ` Muchun Song
2021-02-10  2:16   ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YCJTrrirMlH7M5i7@alley \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®