mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
Cc: rdunlap@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] certs: Fix wrong kconfig option used for x509_revocation_list
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 06:38:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YEBkKlxZOgUxtQEm@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210303034418.106762-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com>

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 10:44:18PM -0500, Eric Snowberg wrote:
> This fixes a build issue when x509_revocation_list is not defined.

"Fix a"

Let's stick to the imperative form in commit messages.

> 
> $ make ARCH=x86_64 O=build64 all
> 
>  EXTRACT_CERTS   ../
> At main.c:154:
> - SSL error:0909006C:PEM routines:get_name:no start line: crypto/pem/pem_lib.c:745
> extract-cert: ../: Is a directory
> make[2]: [../certs/Makefile:119: certs/x509_revocation_list] Error 1 (ignored)
> 
> When the new CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST was added [1], it was not carried
> into the code for preloading the revocation certificates [2].  Change from
> using the original CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING  to the new
> CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/EDA280F9-F72D-4181-93C7-CDBE95976FF7@oracle.com/T/#m562c1b27bf402190e7bb573ad20eff5b6310d08f
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/EDA280F9-F72D-4181-93C7-CDBE95976FF7@oracle.com/T/#m07e258bf019ccbac23820fad5192ceffa74fc6ab
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>
> ---
>  certs/Makefile    | 7 +++++--
>  certs/blacklist.c | 4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/certs/Makefile b/certs/Makefile
> index e3f4926fd21e..3bc43c88a6d2 100644
> --- a/certs/Makefile
> +++ b/certs/Makefile
> @@ -4,7 +4,10 @@
>  #
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING) += system_keyring.o system_certificates.o common.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o revocation_certificates.o common.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist.o common.o
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += revocation_certificates.o
> +endif
>  ifneq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_HASH_LIST),"")
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING) += blacklist_hashes.o
>  else
> @@ -105,7 +108,7 @@ $(obj)/signing_key.x509: scripts/extract-cert $(X509_DEP) FORCE
>  	$(call if_changed,extract_certs,$(MODULE_SIG_KEY_SRCPREFIX)$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_KEY))
>  endif # CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
>  
> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING),y)
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST),y)
>  
>  $(eval $(call config_filename,SYSTEM_REVOCATION_KEYS))
>  
> diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c
> index 723b19c96256..c9a435b15af4 100644
> --- a/certs/blacklist.c
> +++ b/certs/blacklist.c
> @@ -21,8 +21,10 @@
>  
>  static struct key *blacklist_keyring;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
>  extern __initconst const u8 revocation_certificate_list[];
>  extern __initconst const unsigned long revocation_certificate_list_size;
> +#endif
>  
>  /*
>   * The description must be a type prefix, a colon and then an even number of
> @@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ static int __init blacklist_init(void)
>   */
>  device_initcall(blacklist_init);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST
>  /*
>   * Load the compiled-in list of revocation X.509 certificates.
>   */
> @@ -237,3 +240,4 @@ static __init int load_revocation_certificate_list(void)
>  				     blacklist_keyring);
>  }
>  late_initcall(load_revocation_certificate_list);
> +#endif
> -- 
> 2.18.4
> 
> 

Code change looks good.

/Jarkko

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  4:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-03  3:44 Eric Snowberg
2021-03-03  9:24 ` David Howells
2021-03-04  2:45   ` Eric Snowberg
2021-03-04 15:25   ` David Howells
2021-03-04  4:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YEBkKlxZOgUxtQEm@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®