From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] counter: drop chrdev_lock
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:14:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YW0673OckeCY6Qs/@shinobu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211017185521.3468640-1-david@lechnology.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4494 bytes --]
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 01:55:21PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> This removes the chrdev_lock from the counter subsystem. This was
> intended to prevent opening the chrdev more than once. However, this
> doesn't work in practice since userspace can duplicate file descriptors
> and pass file descriptors to other processes. Since this protection
> can't be relied on, it is best to just remove it.
>
> Suggested-by: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Hi David,
If userspace can bypass this protection then we might as well remove the
code as moot. In agree in principle to this change, but I do have some
comments inline below.
> ---
> drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c | 6 ------
> drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c | 13 +++----------
> include/linux/counter.h | 7 -------
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c b/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c
> index 967c94ae95bb..b747dc81cfc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c
> @@ -384,10 +384,6 @@ static int counter_chrdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> typeof(*counter),
> chrdev);
>
> - /* Ensure chrdev is not opened more than 1 at a time */
> - if (!atomic_add_unless(&counter->chrdev_lock, 1, 1))
> - return -EBUSY;
> -
> get_device(&counter->dev);
> filp->private_data = counter;
>
> @@ -419,7 +415,6 @@ static int counter_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> mutex_unlock(&counter->ops_exist_lock);
>
> put_device(&counter->dev);
> - atomic_dec(&counter->chrdev_lock);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -445,7 +440,6 @@ int counter_chrdev_add(struct counter_device *const counter)
> mutex_init(&counter->events_lock);
>
> /* Initialize character device */
We can remove this comment because the purpose of calling cdev_init() is
obvious enough from the name.
> - atomic_set(&counter->chrdev_lock, 0);
> cdev_init(&counter->chrdev, &counter_fops);
>
> /* Allocate Counter events queue */
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c b/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c
> index 1ccd771da25f..7bf8882ff54d 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c
> @@ -796,25 +796,18 @@ static int counter_events_queue_size_write(struct counter_device *counter,
> u64 val)
> {
> DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR(events, struct counter_event);
> - int err = 0;
> -
> - /* Ensure chrdev is not opened more than 1 at a time */
> - if (!atomic_add_unless(&counter->chrdev_lock, 1, 1))
> - return -EBUSY;
> + int err;
>
> /* Allocate new events queue */
> err = kfifo_alloc(&events, val, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (err)
> - goto exit_early;
> + return err;
>
> /* Swap in new events queue */
> kfifo_free(&counter->events);
> counter->events.kfifo = events.kfifo;
Do we need to hold the events_lock mutex here for this swap in case
counter_chrdev_read() is in the middle of reading the kfifo to
userspace, or do the kfifo macros already protect us from a race
condition here?
William Breathitt Gray
>
> -exit_early:
> - atomic_dec(&counter->chrdev_lock);
> -
> - return err;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static struct counter_comp counter_num_signals_comp =
> diff --git a/include/linux/counter.h b/include/linux/counter.h
> index 22b14a552b1d..0fd99e255a50 100644
> --- a/include/linux/counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/counter.h
> @@ -297,7 +297,6 @@ struct counter_ops {
> * @events: queue of detected Counter events
> * @events_wait: wait queue to allow blocking reads of Counter events
> * @events_lock: lock to protect Counter events queue read operations
> - * @chrdev_lock: lock to limit chrdev to a single open at a time
> * @ops_exist_lock: lock to prevent use during removal
> */
> struct counter_device {
> @@ -325,12 +324,6 @@ struct counter_device {
> DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR(events, struct counter_event);
> wait_queue_head_t events_wait;
> struct mutex events_lock;
> - /*
> - * chrdev_lock is locked by counter_chrdev_open() and unlocked by
> - * counter_chrdev_release(), so a mutex is not possible here because
> - * chrdev_lock will invariably be held when returning to user space
> - */
> - atomic_t chrdev_lock;
> struct mutex ops_exist_lock;
> };
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-18 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-17 18:55 David Lechner
2021-10-18 6:08 ` Greg KH
2021-10-18 8:58 ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-18 9:13 ` Greg KH
2021-10-18 9:51 ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-18 16:14 ` David Lechner
2021-10-18 23:56 ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-18 9:14 ` William Breathitt Gray [this message]
2021-10-18 16:03 ` David Lechner
2021-10-19 6:53 ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-19 7:07 ` Greg KH
2021-10-19 7:18 ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-19 7:29 ` Greg KH
2021-10-19 7:46 ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-19 9:36 ` Greg KH
2021-10-19 14:44 ` David Lechner
2021-10-19 20:59 ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-20 5:42 ` William Breathitt Gray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YW0673OckeCY6Qs/@shinobu \
--to=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
--cc=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®