mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>
To: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] counter: drop chrdev_lock
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 18:14:23 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YW0673OckeCY6Qs/@shinobu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211017185521.3468640-1-david@lechnology.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4494 bytes --]

On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 01:55:21PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> This removes the chrdev_lock from the counter subsystem. This was
> intended to prevent opening the chrdev more than once. However, this
> doesn't work in practice since userspace can duplicate file descriptors
> and pass file descriptors to other processes. Since this protection
> can't be relied on, it is best to just remove it.
> 
> Suggested-by: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>

Hi David,

If userspace can bypass this protection then we might as well remove the
code as moot. In agree in principle to this change, but I do have some
comments inline below.

> ---
>  drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c |  6 ------
>  drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c  | 13 +++----------
>  include/linux/counter.h          |  7 -------
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c b/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c
> index 967c94ae95bb..b747dc81cfc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/counter-chrdev.c
> @@ -384,10 +384,6 @@ static int counter_chrdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>  							    typeof(*counter),
>  							    chrdev);
>  
> -	/* Ensure chrdev is not opened more than 1 at a time */
> -	if (!atomic_add_unless(&counter->chrdev_lock, 1, 1))
> -		return -EBUSY;
> -
>  	get_device(&counter->dev);
>  	filp->private_data = counter;
>  
> @@ -419,7 +415,6 @@ static int counter_chrdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>  	mutex_unlock(&counter->ops_exist_lock);
>  
>  	put_device(&counter->dev);
> -	atomic_dec(&counter->chrdev_lock);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> @@ -445,7 +440,6 @@ int counter_chrdev_add(struct counter_device *const counter)
>  	mutex_init(&counter->events_lock);
>  
>  	/* Initialize character device */

We can remove this comment because the purpose of calling cdev_init() is
obvious enough from the name.

> -	atomic_set(&counter->chrdev_lock, 0);
>  	cdev_init(&counter->chrdev, &counter_fops);
>  
>  	/* Allocate Counter events queue */
> diff --git a/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c b/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c
> index 1ccd771da25f..7bf8882ff54d 100644
> --- a/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/counter/counter-sysfs.c
> @@ -796,25 +796,18 @@ static int counter_events_queue_size_write(struct counter_device *counter,
>  					   u64 val)
>  {
>  	DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR(events, struct counter_event);
> -	int err = 0;
> -
> -	/* Ensure chrdev is not opened more than 1 at a time */
> -	if (!atomic_add_unless(&counter->chrdev_lock, 1, 1))
> -		return -EBUSY;
> +	int err;
>  
>  	/* Allocate new events queue */
>  	err = kfifo_alloc(&events, val, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (err)
> -		goto exit_early;
> +		return err;
>  
>  	/* Swap in new events queue */
>  	kfifo_free(&counter->events);
>  	counter->events.kfifo = events.kfifo;

Do we need to hold the events_lock mutex here for this swap in case
counter_chrdev_read() is in the middle of reading the kfifo to
userspace, or do the kfifo macros already protect us from a race
condition here?

William Breathitt Gray

>  
> -exit_early:
> -	atomic_dec(&counter->chrdev_lock);
> -
> -	return err;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static struct counter_comp counter_num_signals_comp =
> diff --git a/include/linux/counter.h b/include/linux/counter.h
> index 22b14a552b1d..0fd99e255a50 100644
> --- a/include/linux/counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/counter.h
> @@ -297,7 +297,6 @@ struct counter_ops {
>   * @events:		queue of detected Counter events
>   * @events_wait:	wait queue to allow blocking reads of Counter events
>   * @events_lock:	lock to protect Counter events queue read operations
> - * @chrdev_lock:	lock to limit chrdev to a single open at a time
>   * @ops_exist_lock:	lock to prevent use during removal
>   */
>  struct counter_device {
> @@ -325,12 +324,6 @@ struct counter_device {
>  	DECLARE_KFIFO_PTR(events, struct counter_event);
>  	wait_queue_head_t events_wait;
>  	struct mutex events_lock;
> -	/*
> -	 * chrdev_lock is locked by counter_chrdev_open() and unlocked by
> -	 * counter_chrdev_release(), so a mutex is not possible here because
> -	 * chrdev_lock will invariably be held when returning to user space
> -	 */
> -	atomic_t chrdev_lock;
>  	struct mutex ops_exist_lock;
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-18  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-17 18:55 David Lechner
2021-10-18  6:08 ` Greg KH
2021-10-18  8:58   ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-18  9:13     ` Greg KH
2021-10-18  9:51       ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-18 16:14         ` David Lechner
2021-10-18 23:56           ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-18  9:14 ` William Breathitt Gray [this message]
2021-10-18 16:03   ` David Lechner
2021-10-19  6:53     ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-19  7:07       ` Greg KH
2021-10-19  7:18         ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-19  7:29           ` Greg KH
2021-10-19  7:46             ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-19  9:36               ` Greg KH
2021-10-19 14:44           ` David Lechner
2021-10-19 20:59             ` William Breathitt Gray
2021-10-20  5:42               ` William Breathitt Gray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YW0673OckeCY6Qs/@shinobu \
    --to=vilhelm.gray@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@lechnology.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®