From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: kan.liang@linux.intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using perf_event_open() to sample multiple events of a process
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 01:57:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YYXS8yldO/dwwVD4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYXQRYbRO193U4re@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 01:45:57AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 10:57:50PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > Hello Ken, Peter,
> >
> > I would appreciate some help regarding the use of perf_event_open()
> > to have multiple samples getting into the same mmap’d memory when they
> > are both attached to the same process.
> >
> > I am doing so (using both PERF_FLAG_FD_NO_GROUP and PERF_FLAG_FD_OUTPUT),
> > but it results in -EINVAL. Debugging the code shows that
> > perf_event_set_output() fails due to the following check:
> >
> > /*
> > * If its not a per-cpu rb, it must be the same task.
> > */
> > if (output_event->cpu == -1 && output_event->ctx != event->ctx)
> > goto out;
> >
> > However, it appears that at this point, event->ctx is not initialized
> > (it is null) so the test fails and the whole perf_event_open() syscall
> > fails.
> >
> > Am I missing something? If not, I am unsure, unfortunately, what the
> > proper way to fix it is…
> >
> > I include a small test that fails on my system. The second
> > perf_event_open fails due to the check in perf_event_set_output():
> >
>
> Works when you use the SET_OUTPUT ioctl()...
>
> I think something went sideways in the syscall path and things went out
> of order :/ I'll try and have a look.
The problem seems to be that we call perf_event_set_output() before we
set event->ctx, which is a bit of a problem.
Now, afaict it's been broken since c3f00c70276d ("perf: Separate
find_get_context() from event initialization"), which is ages ago :/
It's waaay too late to try and fix it; I'll be likely to make an even
bigger mess if I tried. Perhaps tomorrow.
Clearly FD_OUTPUT isn't much used :-(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-06 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-05 5:57 Nadav Amit
2021-11-06 0:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-06 0:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-11-08 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-11-08 19:51 ` Nadav Amit
2021-11-06 0:59 ` Nadav Amit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YYXS8yldO/dwwVD4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®