From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
slade@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/3] 5.10.100-rc1 review
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:02:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgU3GBD+FoVrk9Im@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209191248.892853405@linuxfoundation.org>
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:14:18PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.100 release.
> There are 3 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:12:41 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/734
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/738
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-09 19:14 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-02-09 19:14 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/3] moxart: fix potential use-after-free on remove path Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-02-09 19:14 ` [PATCH 5.10 2/3] KVM: s390: Return error on SIDA memop on normal guest Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-02-09 19:14 ` [PATCH 5.10 3/3] crypto: api - Move cryptomgr soft dependency into algapi Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-02-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 5.10 0/3] 5.10.100-rc1 review Pavel Machek
2022-02-10 0:58 ` Shuah Khan
2022-02-10 12:44 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-02-10 16:02 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2022-02-10 17:37 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-02-10 21:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-02-11 1:01 ` Samuel Zou
2022-02-11 6:11 ` Slade Watkins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YgU3GBD+FoVrk9Im@debian \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=slade@sladewatkins.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome