From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/7] x86/entry: Switch the stack after error_entry() returns
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 09:00:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiB1kC7rzwoIQiL4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220303035434.20471-3-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 11:54:29AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
>
> error_entry() calls sync_regs() to settle/copy the pt_regs and switches
> the stack directly after sync_regs(). But error_entry() itself is also
> a function call, the switching has to handle the return address of it
> together, which causes the work complicated and tangly.
>
> Switching to the stack after error_entry() makes the code simpler and
> intuitive.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 16 ++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> index 24846284eda5..a51cad2b7fff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> @@ -323,6 +323,8 @@ SYM_CODE_END(ret_from_fork)
> .macro idtentry_body cfunc has_error_code:req
>
> call error_entry
> + movq %rax, %rsp /* switch stack settled by sync_regs() */
> + ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
> UNWIND_HINT_REGS
>
> movq %rsp, %rdi /* pt_regs pointer into 1st argument*/
> @@ -980,14 +982,10 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(error_entry)
> /* We have user CR3. Change to kernel CR3. */
> SWITCH_TO_KERNEL_CR3 scratch_reg=%rax
>
> + leaq 8(%rsp), %rdi /* arg0 = pt_regs pointer */
> .Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs:
> /* Put us onto the real thread stack. */
> - popq %r12 /* save return addr in %12 */
> - movq %rsp, %rdi /* arg0 = pt_regs pointer */
> call sync_regs
> - movq %rax, %rsp /* switch stack */
> - ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
> - pushq %r12
> RET
>
> /*
> @@ -1019,6 +1017,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(error_entry)
> */
> .Lerror_entry_done_lfence:
> FENCE_SWAPGS_KERNEL_ENTRY
> + leaq 8(%rsp), %rax /* return pt_regs pointer */
> RET
>
> .Lbstep_iret:
> @@ -1039,12 +1038,9 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(error_entry)
> * Pretend that the exception came from user mode: set up pt_regs
> * as if we faulted immediately after IRET.
> */
> - popq %r12 /* save return addr in %12 */
> - movq %rsp, %rdi /* arg0 = pt_regs pointer */
> + leaq 8(%rsp), %rdi /* arg0 = pt_regs pointer */
> call fixup_bad_iret
> - mov %rax, %rsp
> - ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
> - pushq %r12
> + mov %rax, %rdi
> jmp .Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs
> SYM_CODE_END(error_entry)
I can't seem to follow; perhaps I need more wake-up-juice?
Suppose we have .Lerror_bad_iret, then the code flow is something like:
old new
.Lerror_bad_iret
SWAWPGS business
popq %r12 leaq 8(%rsp), %rsi
movq %rsp, %rdi
call fixup_bad_iret call fixup_bad_iret
mov %rax, %rsp mov %rax, %rdi
ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
pushq %r12
jmp .Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs
.Lerror_entry_from_usermode_after_swapgs
pop %r12
movq %rsp, %rdi
call sync_regs call sync_regs
mov %rax, %rsp
ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER
push %r12
RET RET
The thing that appears to me is that syn_regs is called one stack switch
short. This isn't mentioned in the Changelog nor in the comments. Why is
this OK?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-03 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-03 3:54 [PATCH V2 0/7] x86/entry: Clean up entry code Lai Jiangshan
2022-03-03 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] x86/traps: Move pt_regs only in fixup_bad_iret() Lai Jiangshan
2022-03-03 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] x86/entry: Switch the stack after error_entry() returns Lai Jiangshan
2022-03-03 8:00 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-03-07 14:39 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-03-03 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] x86/entry: move PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS out of error_entry Lai Jiangshan
2022-03-03 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-07 14:53 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-03-03 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] x86/entry: Move cld to the start of idtentry Lai Jiangshan
2022-03-03 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] x86/entry: Don't call error_entry for XENPV Lai Jiangshan
2022-03-03 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] x86/entry: Use idtentry macro for entry_INT80_compat Lai Jiangshan
2022-03-03 3:54 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] x86/entry: Convert SWAPGS to swapgs and remove the definition of SWAPGS Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YiB1kC7rzwoIQiL4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®