mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 1/4] kernfs: make ->attr.open RCU protected.
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 07:30:32 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yqd0OJupifpplENB@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61868aa1-6c88-ecd2-beb2-67b87673b805@oracle.com>

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:56:43PM +1000, Imran Khan wrote:
> Agree. I did over think this and went for the safest interface that I could
> think of in each of the use cases. I will remove
> kernfs_check_open_node_protected and use kernfs_deref_open_node_protected in its
> place as well. This will cover all accesses under kernfs_open_file_mutex.
> 
> But we will still need kernfs_deref_open_node for cases where
> !list_empty(&of->list) ensures safe access of ->attr.open and where we can't
> ensure holding of kernfs_open_file_mutex. So we will need 2 deref accessors.
> Right? Just asking this because you mentioned above to come up with one deref
> accessor that can be used in all three use cases
> 
> Please let me if this sounds okay. I can send updated patch-set with these
> changes in place.

Just merge all three into one accessor. You can list both the !list_empty
condition and lock held conditions on the same rcu_dereference_check() call.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-13 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-02  6:39 [PATCH RESEND v4 0/4] " Imran Khan
2022-06-02  6:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 1/4] " Imran Khan
2022-06-12 17:58   ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13  2:36     ` Imran Khan
2022-06-13  2:46       ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13  2:55         ` Imran Khan
2022-06-13  3:09           ` Tejun Heo
2022-06-13  3:56             ` Imran Khan
2022-06-13 17:30               ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2022-06-14  2:31                 ` Imran Khan
2022-06-02  6:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 2/4] kernfs: Change kernfs_notify_list to llist Imran Khan
2022-06-02  6:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 3/4] kernfs: Introduce interface to access global kernfs_open_file_mutex Imran Khan
2022-06-02  6:39 ` [PATCH RESEND v4 4/4] kernfs: Replace global kernfs_open_file_mutex with hashed mutexes Imran Khan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yqd0OJupifpplENB@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=imran.f.khan@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®