mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] cxl/pmem: Use size_add() against integer overflow
@ 2022-09-27  7:02 Yu Zhe
  2022-09-27 16:23 ` Ira Weiny
  2022-10-21 23:07 ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yu Zhe @ 2022-09-27  7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: alison.schofield, vishal.l.verma, ira.weiny, bwidawsk, dan.j.williams
  Cc: linux-cxl, linux-kernel, liqiong, kernel-janitors, Yu Zhe

"struct_size() + n" may cause a integer overflow,
use size_add() to handle it.

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>
---
 drivers/cxl/pmem.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pmem.c b/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
index 7dc0a2fa1a6b..8c08aa009a56 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int cxl_pmem_set_config_data(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* 4-byte status follows the input data in the payload */
-	if (struct_size(cmd, in_buf, cmd->in_length) + 4 > buf_len)
+	if (size_add(struct_size(cmd, in_buf, cmd->in_length), 4) > buf_len)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	set_lsa =
-- 
2.11.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cxl/pmem: Use size_add() against integer overflow
  2022-09-27  7:02 [PATCH] cxl/pmem: Use size_add() against integer overflow Yu Zhe
@ 2022-09-27 16:23 ` Ira Weiny
  2022-09-29  7:02   ` Yu Zhe
  2022-10-21 23:07 ` Dan Williams
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ira Weiny @ 2022-09-27 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yu Zhe
  Cc: Schofield, Alison, Verma, Vishal L, bwidawsk, Williams, Dan J,
	linux-cxl, linux-kernel, liqiong, kernel-janitors

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:02:47AM -0700, Yu Zhe wrote:
> "struct_size() + n" may cause a integer overflow,
> use size_add() to handle it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/pmem.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pmem.c b/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
> index 7dc0a2fa1a6b..8c08aa009a56 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int cxl_pmem_set_config_data(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/* 4-byte status follows the input data in the payload */
> -	if (struct_size(cmd, in_buf, cmd->in_length) + 4 > buf_len)
> +	if (size_add(struct_size(cmd, in_buf, cmd->in_length), 4) > buf_len)

I don't see any benefit here.

struct_size() calls __ab_c_size() which already calls check_add_overflow()?  So
why wrap that in another check?

Were you able to get this to fail with some user input?

Ira

>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	set_lsa =
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cxl/pmem: Use size_add() against integer overflow
  2022-09-27 16:23 ` Ira Weiny
@ 2022-09-29  7:02   ` Yu Zhe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yu Zhe @ 2022-09-29  7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ira Weiny
  Cc: Schofield, Alison, Verma, Vishal L, bwidawsk, Williams, Dan J,
	linux-cxl, linux-kernel, liqiong, kernel-janitors

在 2022年09月28日 00:23, Ira Weiny 写道:

> On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 12:02:47AM -0700, Yu Zhe wrote:
>> "struct_size() + n" may cause a integer overflow,
>> use size_add() to handle it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cxl/pmem.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pmem.c b/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
>> index 7dc0a2fa1a6b..8c08aa009a56 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
>> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int cxl_pmem_set_config_data(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   
>>   	/* 4-byte status follows the input data in the payload */
>> -	if (struct_size(cmd, in_buf, cmd->in_length) + 4 > buf_len)
>> +	if (size_add(struct_size(cmd, in_buf, cmd->in_length), 4) > buf_len)
> I don't see any benefit here.
>
> struct_size() calls __ab_c_size() which already calls check_add_overflow()?  So
> why wrap that in another check?
"struct_size() + 4" still might cause overflow, so there need to use 
"size_add" to check it.
> Were you able to get this to fail with some user input?
>
> Ira
>
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   
>>   	set_lsa =
>> -- 
>> 2.11.0
>>
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH] cxl/pmem: Use size_add() against integer overflow
  2022-09-27  7:02 [PATCH] cxl/pmem: Use size_add() against integer overflow Yu Zhe
  2022-09-27 16:23 ` Ira Weiny
@ 2022-10-21 23:07 ` Dan Williams
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2022-10-21 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yu Zhe, alison.schofield, vishal.l.verma, ira.weiny, bwidawsk,
	dan.j.williams
  Cc: linux-cxl, linux-kernel, liqiong, kernel-janitors, Yu Zhe

Yu Zhe wrote:
> "struct_size() + n" may cause a integer overflow,
> use size_add() to handle it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/pmem.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pmem.c b/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
> index 7dc0a2fa1a6b..8c08aa009a56 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pmem.c
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static int cxl_pmem_set_config_data(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/* 4-byte status follows the input data in the payload */
> -	if (struct_size(cmd, in_buf, cmd->in_length) + 4 > buf_len)
> +	if (size_add(struct_size(cmd, in_buf, cmd->in_length), 4) > buf_len)
>  		return -EINVAL;

Looks good, applied for v6.1-rc fixes.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-10-21 23:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-27  7:02 [PATCH] cxl/pmem: Use size_add() against integer overflow Yu Zhe
2022-09-27 16:23 ` Ira Weiny
2022-09-29  7:02   ` Yu Zhe
2022-10-21 23:07 ` Dan Williams

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®