From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] bug: Introduce CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_EXTRA=y to also log warning conditions
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:18:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-KRD3ODxT9f8Yjw@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z-J5UEFwM3gh6VXR@gmail.com>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > #define SCHED_WARN_ON(x) WARN_ONCE(x, #x)
> > >
> > > Because SCHED_WARN_ON() would output the 'x' condition
> > > as well, while WARN_ONCE() will only show a backtrace.
> > >
> > > Hopefully these are rare enough to not really matter.
> > >
> > > If it does, we should probably introduce a new WARN_ON()
> > > variant that outputs the condition in stringified form,
> > > or improve WARN_ON() itself.
> >
> > So those strings really were useful, trouble is WARN_ONCE() generates
> > utter crap code compared to WARN_ON_ONCE(), but since SCHED_DEBUG that
> > doesn't really matter.
>
> Why wouldn't it matter? CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG was turned on for 99.9999%
> of Linux users, ie. we generated crap code for most of our users.
>
> And as a side effect of using the standard WARN_ON_ONCE() primitive we
> now generate better code, at the expense of harder to interpret debug
> output, right?
>
> Ie. CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG has obfuscated crappy code generation under the
> "it's only debugging code" pretense, right?
So, to argue this via code, we'd like to have something like the patch below?
When enabled it will warn in the following fashion:
static void super_perfect_kernel_function(void *ptr)
{
...
WARN_ON_ONCE(ptr == 0 && 1);
...
}
------------[ cut here ]------------
FAIL: 'ptr == 0 && 1' is true
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/core.c:8511 sched_init+0x44/0x430
...
But the real question is, how do we keep distros from enabling
CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_EXTRA=y?
It does bloat the defconfig by about +144k .text and ~64k data, so
maybe that's deterrence enough.
The BSS shift is due to it not using the clever x86 U2D tricks, right?
Thanks,
Ingo
=================>
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 11:35:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] bug: Introduce CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_EXTRA=y to also log warning conditions
text data bss dec hex filename
29522704 7926322 1389904 38838930 250a292 vmlinux.before
29667392 8017958 1363024 39048374 253d4b6 vmlinux.after
Totally-Not-Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
include/asm-generic/bug.h | 7 +++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++
lib/Kconfig.debug | 12 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
index 387720933973..5475258a99dc 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
@@ -92,6 +92,11 @@ void warn_slowpath_fmt(const char *file, const int line, unsigned taint,
const char *fmt, ...);
extern __printf(1, 2) void __warn_printk(const char *fmt, ...);
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_EXTRA
+#define WARN_ON_ONCE(condition) \
+ DO_ONCE_LITE_IF(condition, WARN, 1, "FAIL: '%s' is true", #condition)
+#endif
+
#ifndef __WARN_FLAGS
#define __WARN() __WARN_printf(TAINT_WARN, NULL)
#define __WARN_printf(taint, arg...) do { \
@@ -107,6 +112,7 @@ extern __printf(1, 2) void __warn_printk(const char *fmt, ...);
__WARN_FLAGS(BUGFLAG_NO_CUT_HERE | BUGFLAG_TAINT(taint));\
instrumentation_end(); \
} while (0)
+#ifndef WARN_ON_ONCE
#define WARN_ON_ONCE(condition) ({ \
int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition); \
if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) \
@@ -115,6 +121,7 @@ extern __printf(1, 2) void __warn_printk(const char *fmt, ...);
unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
})
#endif
+#endif
/* used internally by panic.c */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 87540217fc09..71bf94bf68f8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8508,6 +8508,8 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
unsigned long ptr = 0;
int i;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(ptr == 0 && 1);
+
/* Make sure the linker didn't screw up */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
BUG_ON(!sched_class_above(&stop_sched_class, &dl_sched_class));
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index b1b92a9a8f24..88f215f712f8 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -206,6 +206,18 @@ config DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
of the BUG call as well as the EIP and oops trace. This aids
debugging but costs about 70-100K of memory.
+config DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_EXTRA
+ bool "Extra verbose WARN_ON() reporting" if DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
+ default n
+ help
+ Say Y here to make WARN_ON() warnings extra verbose, printing
+ the condition they warn about.
+
+ This aids debugging but uses up some memory and causes some
+ runtime overhead due to worse code generation.
+
+ If unsure, say N.
+
endmenu # "printk and dmesg options"
config DEBUG_KERNEL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-25 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 10:42 [PATCH 0/5] sched: Make CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG features unconditional Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 10:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/debug: Change SCHED_WARN_ON() to WARN_ON_ONCE() Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 9:00 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-03-24 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-25 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 11:18 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-03-25 12:36 ` [PATCH] bug: Introduce CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE_EXTRA=y to also log warning conditions Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-25 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-25 18:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-25 22:42 ` [PATCH] bug: Add the condition string to the CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y output Ingo Molnar
2025-03-25 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-26 7:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 10:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/debug: Make 'const_debug' tunables unconditional __read_mostly Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 9:00 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 10:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/debug: Make CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG functionality unconditional Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 9:00 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 10:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/debug, Documentation: Remove (most) CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG references from documentation Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 9:00 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 10:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/debug: Remove CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 8:59 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2025-03-24 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-17 21:39 ` [PATCH 0/5] sched: Make CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG features unconditional Linus Torvalds
2025-03-17 22:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-17 22:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-19 8:49 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-03-19 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-19 12:48 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-19 21:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-20 4:41 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-20 9:00 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/debug: Remove CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG from self-test config files tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-KRD3ODxT9f8Yjw@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®