From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] sched_ext: idle: Refresh idle masks during idle-to-idle transitions
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 22:40:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4GT3Q4U_E8bQHrl@gpd3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4GTA4vw6-5_JAox@slm.duckdns.org>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 11:37:07AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 10:23:21PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> ...
> > + /*
> > + * Update the idle masks:
> > + * - for real idle transitions (do_notify == true)
> > + * - for idle-to-idle transitions (indicated by the previous task
> > + * being the idle thread, managed by pick_task_idle())
> > + *
> > + * Skip updating idle masks if the previous task is not the idle
> > + * thread, since set_next_task_idle() has already handled it when
> > + * transitioning from a task to the idle thread (calling this
> > + * function with do_notify == true).
> > + *
> > + * In this way we can avoid updating the idle masks twice,
> > + * unnecessarily.
> > + */
> > + if (do_notify || is_idle_task(rq->curr))
> > + update_idle_masks(cpu, idle);
>
> Sorry about the multiple nitpicks but wouldn't it be better to have the
> static_key test before dynamic tests? I'd move scx_builtin_idle_enabled test
> out of update_idle_masks() and put that in front of other tests here. Also,
> maybe name the function update_builtin_idle() to stay consistent with the
> static_key name? Otherwise looks good to me.
No problem, all makes sense to me. I'll apply these changes and send a v8.
Thanks for the review!
-Andrea
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-10 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-10 21:23 Andrea Righi
2025-01-10 21:37 ` Tejun Heo
2025-01-10 21:40 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4GT3Q4U_E8bQHrl@gpd3 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome