From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: Bound the number of dirty ring entries in a single reset at INT_MAX
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 14:48:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z4S3JTP71zdJFJqD@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250111010409.1252942-2-seanjc@google.com>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 05:04:05PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Cap the number of ring entries that are reset in a single ioctl to INT_MAX
> to ensure userspace isn't confused by a wrap into negative space, and so
> that, in a truly pathological scenario, KVM doesn't miss a TLB flush due
> to the count wrapping to zero. While the size of the ring is fixed at
> 0x10000 entries and KVM (currently) supports at most 4096, userspace is
> allowed to harvest entries from the ring while the reset is in-progress,
> i.e. it's possible for the ring to always harvested entries.
>
> Opportunistically return an actual error code from the helper so that a
> future fix to handle pending signals can gracefully return -EINTR.
>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> Cc: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> Fixes: fb04a1eddb1a ("KVM: X86: Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h | 8 +++++---
> virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c | 10 +++++-----
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 9 ++++++---
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h b/include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h
> index 4862c98d80d3..82829243029d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_dirty_ring.h
> @@ -49,9 +49,10 @@ static inline int kvm_dirty_ring_alloc(struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring,
> }
>
> static inline int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm,
> - struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring)
> + struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring,
> + int *nr_entries_reset)
> {
> - return 0;
> + return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> static inline void kvm_dirty_ring_push(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> @@ -81,7 +82,8 @@ int kvm_dirty_ring_alloc(struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring, int index, u32 size);
> * called with kvm->slots_lock held, returns the number of
> * processed pages.
> */
> -int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring);
> +int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring,
> + int *nr_entries_reset);
>
> /*
> * returns =0: successfully pushed
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
> index 7bc74969a819..2faf894dec5a 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/dirty_ring.c
> @@ -104,19 +104,19 @@ static inline bool kvm_dirty_gfn_harvested(struct kvm_dirty_gfn *gfn)
> return smp_load_acquire(&gfn->flags) & KVM_DIRTY_GFN_F_RESET;
> }
>
> -int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring)
> +int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring,
> + int *nr_entries_reset)
> {
> u32 cur_slot, next_slot;
> u64 cur_offset, next_offset;
> unsigned long mask;
> - int count = 0;
> struct kvm_dirty_gfn *entry;
> bool first_round = true;
>
> /* This is only needed to make compilers happy */
> cur_slot = cur_offset = mask = 0;
>
> - while (true) {
> + while (likely((*nr_entries_reset) < INT_MAX)) {
> entry = &ring->dirty_gfns[ring->reset_index & (ring->size - 1)];
>
> if (!kvm_dirty_gfn_harvested(entry))
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring)
> kvm_dirty_gfn_set_invalid(entry);
>
> ring->reset_index++;
> - count++;
> + (*nr_entries_reset)++;
> /*
> * Try to coalesce the reset operations when the guest is
> * scanning pages in the same slot.
> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ int kvm_dirty_ring_reset(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_ring *ring)
>
> trace_kvm_dirty_ring_reset(ring);
>
> - return count;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> void kvm_dirty_ring_push(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 slot, u64 offset)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 9d54473d18e3..2d63b4d46ccb 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -4877,15 +4877,18 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_reset_dirty_pages(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> unsigned long i;
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> - int cleared = 0;
> + int cleared = 0, r;
>
> if (!kvm->dirty_ring_size)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>
> - kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> - cleared += kvm_dirty_ring_reset(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->dirty_ring);
Previously "cleared" counts all cleared count in all vCPUs.
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> + r = kvm_dirty_ring_reset(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->dirty_ring, &cleared);
Here it's reset to the cleared count in the last vCPU, possibly causing loss of
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(().
> + if (r)
> + break;
> + }
>
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>
> --
> 2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-13 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-11 1:04 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: Dirty ring fixes and cleanups Sean Christopherson
2025-01-11 1:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: Bound the number of dirty ring entries in a single reset at INT_MAX Sean Christopherson
2025-01-13 6:48 ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2025-01-13 6:57 ` Yan Zhao
2025-01-11 1:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: Bail from the dirty ring reset flow if a signal is pending Sean Christopherson
2025-01-13 9:31 ` Yan Zhao
2025-01-13 15:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-14 7:29 ` Yan Zhao
2025-01-14 17:16 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-11 1:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: Conditionally reschedule when resetting the dirty ring Sean Christopherson
2025-01-13 7:04 ` Yan Zhao
2025-01-13 16:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-14 7:58 ` Yan Zhao
2025-01-11 1:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: Check for empty mask of harvested dirty ring entries in caller Sean Christopherson
2025-01-13 10:30 ` Yan Zhao
2025-01-13 16:48 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-14 8:13 ` Yan Zhao
2025-01-11 1:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: Use mask of harvested dirty ring entries to coalesce dirty ring resets Sean Christopherson
2025-01-13 9:51 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: Dirty ring fixes and cleanups Yan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z4S3JTP71zdJFJqD@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com \
--to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®