Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_it8768e: Create iTE IT8768E specific 8250 driver

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:36:08AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025, at 10:59, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 01:40:14PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2025, at 13:08, WangYuli wrote:
> >> 
> >> Can you explain why this isn't done as part of
> >> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_pnp.c?
> >
> > I assume you meant 8250_platform.c. PNP is for devices went through legacy PNP
> > enumeration, most likely having IOPORT instead of IOMEM.
> 
> No, I meant the 8250_pnp.c file.

I am puzzled then. How should it work? PNP ID != ACPI HID that's provided in
this patch commit message. On top of that, PNP driver uses _legacy_ PMP bus
and infrastructure.

> > Recently 8250_platform.c was expanded to cover ACPI IDs and it seems they have
> > proper ID allocated for their device, so that's where it seems best to fit.
> 
> I don't think we should expand the use of 8250_platform.c
> any more than it is already used for. The ACPI device ID stuff in
> there is really only for one specific platform and should probably
> get moved out as well, the rest is there for hardwired
> "plat_serial8250_port" devices on 25+ year old machines that
> predate any type of firmware (pnpbios, acpibios, of) or hardware
> (ispnp, pci, ...) autodetection for their uarts.

Okay, but I do not see any better fit. Again, PNP is not a fit here or
please elaborate how as I'm lost.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko