mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	hbathini@linux.ibm.com, joelagnelf@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: use online cpus for validating runtime
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 08:29:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8lc79prs3OdUXtB@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250306052954.452005-2-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>

Hi!

On 06/03/25 10:59, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> ftrace selftest reported failure since writing -1 to sched_rt_runtime_us
> return -EBUSY. This happens when the possible CPUs is different than
> the active CPUS.
> 
> Active CPUs are part of one root domain, while remaining CPUs are part
> of def_root_domain. Since active cpumask is being used, this results in
> cpus=0 when a non active CPUs is used in the loop.
> 
> Fix it by looping over the online CPUs instead for validation the
> bandwidth calculations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 2d0f571f95e9..7ea9c040c72f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -3187,7 +3187,7 @@ int sched_dl_global_validate(void)
>  	 * value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
>  	 * any of the root_domains.
>  	 */
> -	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>  		rcu_read_lock_sched();
>  
>  		if (dl_bw_visited(cpu, gen))
> -- 

Makes sense to me.

Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Juri


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-06  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-06  5:29 [PATCH 0/2] sched: issues with sched_rt_runtime_us Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06  5:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: use online cpus for validating runtime Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06  8:29   ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2025-03-06 10:02   ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/deadline: Use " tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06  5:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/rt: update limit of sched_rt sysctl in documentation Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06  8:34   ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-06 10:02   ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/rt: Update " tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8lc79prs3OdUXtB@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb \
    --to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®