From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
hbathini@linux.ibm.com, joelagnelf@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: use online cpus for validating runtime
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 08:29:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8lc79prs3OdUXtB@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250306052954.452005-2-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Hi!
On 06/03/25 10:59, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> ftrace selftest reported failure since writing -1 to sched_rt_runtime_us
> return -EBUSY. This happens when the possible CPUs is different than
> the active CPUS.
>
> Active CPUs are part of one root domain, while remaining CPUs are part
> of def_root_domain. Since active cpumask is being used, this results in
> cpus=0 when a non active CPUs is used in the loop.
>
> Fix it by looping over the online CPUs instead for validation the
> bandwidth calculations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 2d0f571f95e9..7ea9c040c72f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -3187,7 +3187,7 @@ int sched_dl_global_validate(void)
> * value smaller than the currently allocated bandwidth in
> * any of the root_domains.
> */
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> rcu_read_lock_sched();
>
> if (dl_bw_visited(cpu, gen))
> --
Makes sense to me.
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Juri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-06 5:29 [PATCH 0/2] sched: issues with sched_rt_runtime_us Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06 5:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/deadline: use online cpus for validating runtime Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06 8:29 ` Juri Lelli [this message]
2025-03-06 10:02 ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/deadline: Use " tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06 5:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/rt: update limit of sched_rt sysctl in documentation Shrikanth Hegde
2025-03-06 8:34 ` Juri Lelli
2025-03-06 10:02 ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/rt: Update " tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8lc79prs3OdUXtB@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb \
--to=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®