Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] kunit: drm/tests: move generic helpers

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 06:16:27AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> On 3/21/23 20:59, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2023-03-20 22:45:52)
> >> On 3/20/23 21:23, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>> Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2023-03-18 23:36:20)


> >> Besides, I was not sure if you were planning to add similar helper or
> >> just wrappers to individual functions. Wanted to ping you just in case
> >> this has some impact to what you do.
> > 
> > I don't have a need to bind a device to a driver to satisfy devm APIs
> > currently. I could probably use it though to test some devm code in the
> > clk APIs. The only impact is that we're modifying the same files.
> 
> Thanks for clarifying this.
> 
> >>> Have you Cced kunit folks and the
> >>> list on the kunit patches? They may have some opinion.
> >>
> >> This patch was should have contained the
> >> include/kunit/platform_device.h. That file was pulling the Kunit people
> >> in recipients but I messed up things with last minute changes so both
> >> the header and people were dropped. I'll fix this for v5.
> > 
> > Ok, I'll be on the lookout for v5. From what I can tell kunit goes
> > through the kernel selftest tree and there isn't a kunit git tree as
> > such.
> 
> Right. I am not sure what will be the best tree to carry the testability
> changes. It seems that all of the IIO-tests in v5 will depend on the
> kunit stuff, and I think I will also include the DRM test fixes in this
> series as well just to keep things sorted in my mailbox. Anyways, I hope
> to finish the changes for v5 soon(ish) - maybe already Today and in any
> case during this week. I'll be CC:ing you and Brendan with (relevant
> patches of) v5 as well.

Thank you, folks, for doing this. Let's make Linux kernel greater
(than it is already is).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko