mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <seanjc@google.com>, <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	<robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: VMX: drop IPAT in memtype when CD=1 for KVM_X86_QUIRK_CD_NW_CLEARED
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 11:34:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZJEeUywBg5q/bSYi@chao-email> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZJEQNTvfwOSsSzrf@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:34:29AM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:42:57AM +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 10:38:15AM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote:
>> >For KVM_X86_QUIRK_CD_NW_CLEARED, remove the ignore PAT bit in EPT memory
>> >types when cache is disabled and non-coherent DMA are present.
>> >
>> >With the quirk KVM_X86_QUIRK_CD_NW_CLEARED, WB + IPAT are returned as the
>> >EPT memory type when guest cache is disabled before this patch.
>> >Removing the IPAT bit in this patch will allow effective memory type to
>> >honor PAT values as well, which will make the effective memory type
>> 
>> Given guest sets CR0.CD, what's the point of honoring (guest) PAT? e.g.,
>> which guests can benefit from this change?
>This patch is actually a preparation for later patch 10 to implement
>fine-grained zap.
>If when CR0.CD=1 the EPT type is WB + IPAT, and
>when CR0.CD=0 + mtrr enabled, EPT type is WB or UC or ..., which are
>without IPAT, then we have to always zap all EPT entries.

OK. The goal is to reduce the cost of toggling CR0.CD. The key is if KVM sets
the IPAT, then when CR0.CD is cleared by guest, KVM has to zap _all_ EPT entries
at least to clear IPAT.

Can kvm honor guest MTRRs as well when CR0.CD=1 && with the quirk? then later
clearing CR0.CD needn't zap _any_ EPT entry. But the optimization is exactly the
one removed in patch 6. Maybe I miss something important.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-20  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-16  2:31 [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86/mmu: refine memtype related mmu zap Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  2:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: x86/mmu: helpers to return if KVM honors guest MTRRs Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  2:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM honors guest MTRRs helper in kvm_tdp_page_fault() Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  2:35 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM honors guest MTRRs helper when CR0.CD toggles Yan Zhao
2023-06-28 21:59   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-29  1:42     ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  2:36 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: x86/mmu: Use KVM honors guest MTRRs helper when update mtrr Yan Zhao
2023-06-28 22:08   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: x86/mmu: zap KVM TDP when noncoherent DMA assignment starts/stops Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  2:37 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: x86/mmu: move TDP zaps from guest MTRRs update to CR0.CD toggling Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  2:38 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: VMX: drop IPAT in memtype when CD=1 for KVM_X86_QUIRK_CD_NW_CLEARED Yan Zhao
2023-06-20  2:42   ` Chao Gao
2023-06-20  2:34     ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-20  3:34       ` Chao Gao [this message]
2023-06-20  3:19         ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-25  7:14       ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-06-26  0:08         ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-26  3:40           ` Yuan Yao
2023-06-26  3:38             ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-20  3:17     ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  2:38 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: x86: move vmx code to get EPT memtype when CR0.CD=1 to x86 common code Yan Zhao
2023-06-28 22:57   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-29  0:55     ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-29 20:42       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-30  7:49         ` Yan Zhao
2023-07-14  7:00           ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  2:39 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: x86/mmu: serialize vCPUs to zap gfn when guest MTRRs are honored Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  7:45   ` Yuan Yao
2023-06-16  7:37     ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  8:09       ` Yuan Yao
2023-06-16  7:50         ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-28 23:00   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-29  1:51     ` Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  2:41 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: x86/mmu: fine-grained gfn zap " Yan Zhao
2023-06-16  2:42 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: x86/mmu: split a single gfn zap range " Yan Zhao
2023-06-28 23:02 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86/mmu: refine memtype related mmu zap Sean Christopherson
2023-07-14  7:11   ` Yan Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZJEeUywBg5q/bSYi@chao-email \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hoo.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®