mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: smp: Assign and setup the debug IPI
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:17:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNDEyT3mHCl0UQIV@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601143109.v9.4.I6d7f7d5fa0aa293c8c3374194947254b93114d37@changeid>

On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 02:31:48PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> 
> All current arm64 interrupt controllers have at least 8
> IPIs. Currently we are only using 7 of them on arm64. Let's use the
> 8th one as a debug IPI. This uses the new "debug IPI" infrastructure
> which will try to allocate this IPI as an NMI/pseudo NMI if possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

I think with my suggestion on the prior patch, we don't need the additional
logic here.

> ---
> I could imagine that people object to using up the last free IPI on
> interrupt controllers with only 8 IPIs. However, it shouldn't be a big
> deal. If we later need an extra IPI, it shouldn't be too hard to
> combine some of the existing ones. Presumably we could just get rid of
> the "crash stop" IPI and have the normal "stop" IPI do the crash if
> "waiting_for_crash_ipi" is non-zero

TBH, I'd love to unify the logic for IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP as
they have a bunch of pointless divergence.

We could also remove IPI_WAKEUP and replace that with something else (e.g.
IPI_CALL_FUNC with an empty function) in order to free up an IPI.

I'd *also* prefer to have separate IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE and IPI_CPU_DEBUG as the
backtrace logic is used for a bunch of things other than KGDB (e.g. RCU stalls,
panic), and that would clearly separate the logic for the two cases.

Thanks,
Mark.

> 
> Changes in v9:
> - Add a warning if we don't have enough IPIs for the NMI IPI
> - Renamed "NMI IPI" to "debug IPI" since it might not be backed by NMI.
> - Update commit description
> 
> Changes in v8:
> - debug_ipi_setup() and debug_ipi_teardown() no longer take cpu param
> 
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index edd63894d61e..db019b49d3bd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@
>  
>  #include <trace/events/ipi.h>
>  
> +#include "ipi_debug.h"
> +
>  DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(int, cpu_number);
>  EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_number);
>  
> @@ -935,6 +937,8 @@ static void ipi_setup(int cpu)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++)
>  		enable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i, 0);
> +
> +	debug_ipi_setup();
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> @@ -947,6 +951,8 @@ static void ipi_teardown(int cpu)
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++)
>  		disable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i);
> +
> +	debug_ipi_teardown();
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> @@ -968,6 +974,11 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n)
>  		irq_set_status_flags(ipi_base + i, IRQ_HIDDEN);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (n > nr_ipi)
> +		set_smp_debug_ipi(ipi_base + nr_ipi);
> +	else
> +		WARN(1, "Not enough IPIs for NMI IPI\n");
> +
>  	ipi_irq_base = ipi_base;
>  
>  	/* Setup the boot CPU immediately */
> -- 
> 2.41.0.rc2.161.g9c6817b8e7-goog
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-07 10:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-01 21:31 [PATCH v9 0/7] arm64: Add debug IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for it Douglas Anderson
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07  9:50   ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 11:22     ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-07 13:25       ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07  9:52   ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] arm64: Add framework for a debug IPI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:12   ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-21 22:16     ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-22  6:42       ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: smp: Assign and setup the " Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:17   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] arm64: ipi_debug: Add support for backtrace using " Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:23   ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-22  0:06     ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-22  6:35       ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] kgdb: Provide a stub kgdb_nmicallback() if !CONFIG_KGDB Douglas Anderson
2023-06-15 18:14   ` Doug Anderson
2023-06-26 14:30     ` Daniel Thompson
2023-08-07 10:27   ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 10:29     ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] arm64: kgdb: Roundup cpus using the debug IPI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:28   ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 10:47     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-07 10:54       ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 11:08         ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-07 11:13           ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 15:24     ` Daniel Thompson
2023-08-07 16:04       ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-08 11:17         ` Daniel Thompson
2023-06-02  5:19 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] arm64: Add debug IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for it Sumit Garg
2023-07-24 15:55 ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-07 10:41   ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 12:46     ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-07 14:43       ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZNDEyT3mHCl0UQIV@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®