From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Lecopzer Chen <lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: smp: Assign and setup the debug IPI
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 11:17:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNDEyT3mHCl0UQIV@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230601143109.v9.4.I6d7f7d5fa0aa293c8c3374194947254b93114d37@changeid>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 02:31:48PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
>
> All current arm64 interrupt controllers have at least 8
> IPIs. Currently we are only using 7 of them on arm64. Let's use the
> 8th one as a debug IPI. This uses the new "debug IPI" infrastructure
> which will try to allocate this IPI as an NMI/pseudo NMI if possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
I think with my suggestion on the prior patch, we don't need the additional
logic here.
> ---
> I could imagine that people object to using up the last free IPI on
> interrupt controllers with only 8 IPIs. However, it shouldn't be a big
> deal. If we later need an extra IPI, it shouldn't be too hard to
> combine some of the existing ones. Presumably we could just get rid of
> the "crash stop" IPI and have the normal "stop" IPI do the crash if
> "waiting_for_crash_ipi" is non-zero
TBH, I'd love to unify the logic for IPI_CPU_STOP and IPI_CPU_CRASH_STOP as
they have a bunch of pointless divergence.
We could also remove IPI_WAKEUP and replace that with something else (e.g.
IPI_CALL_FUNC with an empty function) in order to free up an IPI.
I'd *also* prefer to have separate IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE and IPI_CPU_DEBUG as the
backtrace logic is used for a bunch of things other than KGDB (e.g. RCU stalls,
panic), and that would clearly separate the logic for the two cases.
Thanks,
Mark.
>
> Changes in v9:
> - Add a warning if we don't have enough IPIs for the NMI IPI
> - Renamed "NMI IPI" to "debug IPI" since it might not be backed by NMI.
> - Update commit description
>
> Changes in v8:
> - debug_ipi_setup() and debug_ipi_teardown() no longer take cpu param
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index edd63894d61e..db019b49d3bd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@
>
> #include <trace/events/ipi.h>
>
> +#include "ipi_debug.h"
> +
> DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(int, cpu_number);
> EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_number);
>
> @@ -935,6 +937,8 @@ static void ipi_setup(int cpu)
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++)
> enable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i, 0);
> +
> + debug_ipi_setup();
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> @@ -947,6 +951,8 @@ static void ipi_teardown(int cpu)
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_ipi; i++)
> disable_percpu_irq(ipi_irq_base + i);
> +
> + debug_ipi_teardown();
> }
> #endif
>
> @@ -968,6 +974,11 @@ void __init set_smp_ipi_range(int ipi_base, int n)
> irq_set_status_flags(ipi_base + i, IRQ_HIDDEN);
> }
>
> + if (n > nr_ipi)
> + set_smp_debug_ipi(ipi_base + nr_ipi);
> + else
> + WARN(1, "Not enough IPIs for NMI IPI\n");
> +
> ipi_irq_base = ipi_base;
>
> /* Setup the boot CPU immediately */
> --
> 2.41.0.rc2.161.g9c6817b8e7-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-07 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-01 21:31 [PATCH v9 0/7] arm64: Add debug IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for it Douglas Anderson
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 9:50 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 11:22 ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-07 13:25 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] arm64: idle: Tag the arm64 idle functions as __cpuidle Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 9:52 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] arm64: Add framework for a debug IPI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:12 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-21 22:16 ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-22 6:42 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: smp: Assign and setup the " Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:17 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] arm64: ipi_debug: Add support for backtrace using " Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:23 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-22 0:06 ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-22 6:35 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] kgdb: Provide a stub kgdb_nmicallback() if !CONFIG_KGDB Douglas Anderson
2023-06-15 18:14 ` Doug Anderson
2023-06-26 14:30 ` Daniel Thompson
2023-08-07 10:27 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 10:29 ` Mark Rutland
2023-06-01 21:31 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] arm64: kgdb: Roundup cpus using the debug IPI Douglas Anderson
2023-08-07 10:28 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 10:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-07 10:54 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 11:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-08-07 11:13 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 15:24 ` Daniel Thompson
2023-08-07 16:04 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-08 11:17 ` Daniel Thompson
2023-06-02 5:19 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] arm64: Add debug IPI for backtraces / kgdb; try to use NMI for it Sumit Garg
2023-07-24 15:55 ` Doug Anderson
2023-08-07 10:41 ` Mark Rutland
2023-08-07 12:46 ` Sumit Garg
2023-08-07 14:43 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNDEyT3mHCl0UQIV@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=lecopzer.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®