From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] gpiolib: reverse-assign the fwnode to struct gpio_chip
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 16:14:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSAIUVAQ6ifi8LTL@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006115147.18559-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> struct gpio_chip is not only used to carry the information needed to
> set-up a GPIO device but is also used in all GPIOLIB callbacks and is
> passed to the matching functions of lookup helpers.
>
> In that last case, it is currently impossible to match a GPIO device by
> fwnode unless it was explicitly assigned to the chip in the provider
> code.
That's expected behaviour.
> If the fwnode is taken from the parent device, the pointer in
> struct gpio_chip will remain NULL.
> If we have a parent device but gc->fwnode was not assigned by the
> provider, let's assign it ourselves so that lookup by fwnode can work in
> all cases.
I don't think this is a good change. We paper over the real issue where
we and callers need to understand what they are looking for.
...
> This is something that Dipen reported with one of the tegra drivers where
> a GPIO lookup by fwnode does not work because the fwnode pointer in struct
> gpio_chip is NULL. This patch addresses this use-case.
I am not sure I understand the problem here. All these should have been
addressed already, no?
So, the GPIOLIB should use dev_fwnode(&gdev->dev) inside it, outside it
the GPIO drivers are free to use gc->fwnode as long as they understand
the lifetime of the respective object.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-06 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-06 11:51 Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-06 13:14 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-10-06 19:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-07 7:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-07 15:53 ` Linus Walleij
2023-10-09 18:28 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-06 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-06 19:07 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-06 22:22 ` Linus Walleij
2023-10-07 7:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-07 7:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-06 22:14 ` Linus Walleij
2023-10-07 7:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZSAIUVAQ6ifi8LTL@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=dipenp@nvidia.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome