mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] gpiolib: reverse-assign the fwnode to struct gpio_chip
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2023 16:24:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSAKdOXpo+xOI3sJ@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006115147.18559-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> 
> struct gpio_chip is not only used to carry the information needed to
> set-up a GPIO device but is also used in all GPIOLIB callbacks and is
> passed to the matching functions of lookup helpers.
> 
> In that last case, it is currently impossible to match a GPIO device by
> fwnode unless it was explicitly assigned to the chip in the provider
> code. If the fwnode is taken from the parent device, the pointer in
> struct gpio_chip will remain NULL.
> 
> If we have a parent device but gc->fwnode was not assigned by the
> provider, let's assign it ourselves so that lookup by fwnode can work in
> all cases.

...

> +		gc->fwnode = parent_fwnode;

Ah, this is basically reverts my commit, the whole idea of which was to go
towards constant struct gpio_chip object that is supplied by a provider.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-06 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-06 11:51 Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-06 13:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-06 19:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-07  7:45     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-07 15:53       ` Linus Walleij
2023-10-09 18:28       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-06 13:24 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2023-10-06 19:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2023-10-06 22:22     ` Linus Walleij
2023-10-07  7:39       ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-07  7:36     ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-10-06 22:14 ` Linus Walleij
2023-10-07  7:03   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZSAKdOXpo+xOI3sJ@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=dipenp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome