mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Cestmir Kalina <ckalina@redhat.com>,
	Alex Gladkov <agladkov@redhat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
	Costa Shulyupin <cshulyup@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-wq v3 0/4] workqueue: Enable unbound cpumask update on ordered workqueues
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 14:04:58 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcF3qmion7H6qyYY@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcE8pUuHfa7gVZs6@slm.duckdns.org>

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 09:53:09AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 02:45:58PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> >  v3:
> >   - [v2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240203154334.791910-1-longman@redhat.com/
> >   - Drop patch 1 as it has been merged into the for-6.9 branch.
> >   - Use rcu_access_pointer() to access wq->dfl_pwq.
> >   - Use RCU protection instead of acquiring wq->mutex in
> >     apply_wqattrs_cleanup().
> 
> Looks like we raced each other. I'll wait for v4.

BTW, please don't bother to handle __WQ_ORDERED being cleared. We are very
close to removing the implicit ORDERED promotion, so we should be able to
apply the patch to remove the distinction between explicitly and implicitly
ordered workqueues.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-05 19:45 Waiman Long
2024-02-05 19:45 ` [PATCH-wq v3 1/4] " Waiman Long
2024-02-05 19:46 ` [PATCH-wq v3 2/4] workqueue: Thaw frozen pwq in workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask() Waiman Long
2024-02-05 19:46 ` [PATCH-wq v3 3/4] kernel/workqueue: Let rescuers follow unbound wq cpumask changes Waiman Long
2024-02-05 19:46 ` [PATCH-wq v3 4/4] workqueue: Bind unbound workqueue rescuer to wq_unbound_cpumask Waiman Long
2024-02-05 19:53 ` [PATCH-wq v3 0/4] workqueue: Enable unbound cpumask update on ordered workqueues Tejun Heo
2024-02-06  0:04   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-02-06  1:07     ` Waiman Long
2024-02-06  1:24     ` Waiman Long
2024-02-06  1:40       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZcF3qmion7H6qyYY@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=agladkov@redhat.com \
    --cc=ckalina@redhat.com \
    --cc=cshulyup@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®