From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: "Wu, Wentong" <wentong.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mei: vsc: Call wake_up() in the threaded IRQ handler
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 10:42:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZeWlinaMxeNiVhMv@kekkonen.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW5PR11MB5787E314C6DDA3D37FC1992F8D582@MW5PR11MB5787.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Wentong,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 08:19:04AM +0000, Wu, Wentong wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > The hard IRQ handler vsc_tp_irq() is called with a raw spinlock taken.
> > wake_up() acquires a spinlock, a sleeping lock on PREEMPT_RT. This leads to
> > sleeping in atomic context.
> >
> > Move the wake_up() call to the threaded IRQ handler vsc_tp_thread_isr()
> > where it can be safely called.
> >
> > Fixes: 566f5ca97680 ("mei: Add transport driver for IVSC device")
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
>
> Tested-and-Reviewed-by: Wentong Wu <wentong.wu@intel.com>
Thanks!
I dug a little bit deeper and it seems the lockdep warning this patch fixes
is something we can safely ignore, see
<URL:https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Realtime_kernel_patchset#How_does_the_realtime_patch_work>.
My apologies for the noise.
The two other patches in the set are still unaffected by this.
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-04 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-19 19:58 [PATCH v2 0/3] MEI VSC fixes and cleanups Sakari Ailus
2024-02-19 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mei: vsc: Call wake_up() in the threaded IRQ handler Sakari Ailus
2024-02-22 3:26 ` Wu, Wentong
2024-02-22 11:46 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-03-04 10:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-28 8:19 ` Wu, Wentong
2024-03-04 10:42 ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2024-02-19 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mei: vsc: Don't use sleeping condition in wait_event_timeout() Sakari Ailus
2024-02-22 4:30 ` Wu, Wentong
2024-03-05 17:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-05 17:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-19 19:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mei: vsc: Assign pinfo fields in variable declaration Sakari Ailus
2024-02-22 4:32 ` Wu, Wentong
2024-03-05 17:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZeWlinaMxeNiVhMv@kekkonen.localdomain \
--to=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=wentong.wu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®