* Re: [PATCH] block: allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size [not found] <20240407131931.4055231-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> @ 2024-04-24 10:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2024-04-24 12:41 ` Ming Lei 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2024-04-24 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, janpieter.sollie, Christoph Hellwig, Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Song Liu, linux-raid, linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel Hi Ming, On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, Ming Lei wrote: > When one stacking device is over one device with virt_boundary_mask and > another one with max segment size, the stacking device have both limits > set. This way is allowed before d690cb8ae14b ("block: add an API to > atomically update queue limits"). > > Relax the limit so that we won't break such kind of stacking setting. > > Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218687 > Reported-by: janpieter.sollie@edpnet.be > Fixes: d690cb8ae14b ("block: add an API to atomically update queue limits") > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ZfGl8HzUpiOxCLm3@fedora/ > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org> > Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev > Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Thanks for your patch, which is now commit b561ea56a26415bf ("block: allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size") in v6.9-rc4. With CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG_SG=y and IOMMU support enabled, this causes a warning on R-Car Gen3/Gen4 platforms: DMA-API: renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee160000.mmc: mapping sg segment longer than device claims to support [len=86016] [max=65536] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 281 at kernel/dma/debug.c:1178 debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 281 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-ebisu-00012-gb561ea56a264 #596 Hardware name: Renesas Ebisu board based on r8a77990 (DT) pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330 lr : debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330 sp : ffffffc083643470 x29: ffffffc083643470 x28: 0000000000000080 x27: 0000000000010000 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffffc0810afc30 x23: ffffffffffffffff x22: ffffffc080c8366f x21: ffffff8008849f80 x20: ffffff800cd24000 x19: ffffff80099a2810 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: ffffff800801a000 x16: ffffffc080453f00 x15: ffffffc0836430f0 x14: ffffffc08099fb50 x13: 0000000000000007 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000202 x10: ffffffc0810d99d0 x9 : ffffffc081189bb0 x8 : ffffffc083643178 x7 : ffffffc083643180 x6 : 00000000ffffdfff x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffff800ebad280 Call trace: debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330 __dma_map_sg_attrs+0xcc/0xd0 dma_map_sg_attrs+0xc/0x1c renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_map+0x64/0x94 renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_pre_req+0x20/0x2c mmc_blk_mq_issue_rq+0x62c/0x6c8 mmc_mq_queue_rq+0x194/0x218 blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x36c/0x4d4 __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x344/0x4e0 blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x28/0x5c blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x1a4/0x218 blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x2fc/0x4a0 __blk_flush_plug+0x70/0x134 blk_finish_plug+0x24/0x34 read_pages+0x60/0x158 page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x98/0x184 do_page_cache_ra+0x44/0x50 force_page_cache_ra+0x98/0x9c page_cache_sync_ra+0x30/0x54 filemap_get_pages+0xfc/0x4f8 filemap_read+0xe8/0x2b8 blkdev_read_iter+0x12c/0x144 vfs_read+0x104/0x150 ksys_read+0x6c/0xd4 __arm64_sys_read+0x14/0x1c invoke_syscall+0x70/0xf4 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0xcc do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x24 el0_svc+0x34/0x8c el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffc08007efa4>] copy_process+0x6ac/0x18d4 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffc08007efa4>] copy_process+0x6ac/0x18d4 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 Reverting this commit, or disabling IOMMU support fixes the issue. > --- a/block/blk-settings.c > +++ b/block/blk-settings.c > @@ -182,17 +182,13 @@ static int blk_validate_limits(struct queue_limits *lim) > return -EINVAL; > > /* > - * Devices that require a virtual boundary do not support scatter/gather > - * I/O natively, but instead require a descriptor list entry for each > - * page (which might not be identical to the Linux PAGE_SIZE). Because > - * of that they are not limited by our notion of "segment size". > + * Stacking device may have both virtual boundary and max segment > + * size limit, so allow this setting now, and long-term the two > + * might need to move out of stacking limits since we have immutable > + * bvec and lower layer bio splitting is supposed to handle the two > + * correctly. > */ > - if (lim->virt_boundary_mask) { > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lim->max_segment_size && > - lim->max_segment_size != UINT_MAX)) > - return -EINVAL; > - lim->max_segment_size = UINT_MAX; > - } else { > + if (!lim->virt_boundary_mask) { > /* > * The maximum segment size has an odd historic 64k default that > * drivers probably should override. Just like the I/O size we Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] block: allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size 2024-04-24 10:26 ` [PATCH] block: allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2024-04-24 12:41 ` Ming Lei 2024-04-24 13:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Ming Lei @ 2024-04-24 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, janpieter.sollie, Christoph Hellwig, Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Song Liu, linux-raid, linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:26:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Ming, > > On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, Ming Lei wrote: > > When one stacking device is over one device with virt_boundary_mask and > > another one with max segment size, the stacking device have both limits > > set. This way is allowed before d690cb8ae14b ("block: add an API to > > atomically update queue limits"). > > > > Relax the limit so that we won't break such kind of stacking setting. > > > > Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218687 > > Reported-by: janpieter.sollie@edpnet.be > > Fixes: d690cb8ae14b ("block: add an API to atomically update queue limits") > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ZfGl8HzUpiOxCLm3@fedora/ > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org> > > Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev > > Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> > > Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> > > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit b561ea56a26415bf ("block: > allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size") in > v6.9-rc4. > > With CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG_SG=y and IOMMU support enabled, this causes a > warning on R-Car Gen3/Gen4 platforms: > > DMA-API: renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee160000.mmc: mapping sg segment longer than device claims to support [len=86016] [max=65536] > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 281 at kernel/dma/debug.c:1178 debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330 > Modules linked in: > CPU: 1 PID: 281 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G W 6.9.0-rc2-ebisu-00012-gb561ea56a264 #596 > Hardware name: Renesas Ebisu board based on r8a77990 (DT) > pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > pc : debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330 > lr : debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330 > sp : ffffffc083643470 > x29: ffffffc083643470 x28: 0000000000000080 x27: 0000000000010000 > x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000001 x24: ffffffc0810afc30 > x23: ffffffffffffffff x22: ffffffc080c8366f x21: ffffff8008849f80 > x20: ffffff800cd24000 x19: ffffff80099a2810 x18: 0000000000000000 > x17: ffffff800801a000 x16: ffffffc080453f00 x15: ffffffc0836430f0 > x14: ffffffc08099fb50 x13: 0000000000000007 x12: 0000000000000000 > x11: 0000000000000202 x10: ffffffc0810d99d0 x9 : ffffffc081189bb0 > x8 : ffffffc083643178 x7 : ffffffc083643180 x6 : 00000000ffffdfff > x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000 > x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffff800ebad280 > Call trace: > debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330 > __dma_map_sg_attrs+0xcc/0xd0 > dma_map_sg_attrs+0xc/0x1c > renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_map+0x64/0x94 > renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_pre_req+0x20/0x2c > mmc_blk_mq_issue_rq+0x62c/0x6c8 > mmc_mq_queue_rq+0x194/0x218 > blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x36c/0x4d4 > __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x344/0x4e0 > blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x28/0x5c > blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x1a4/0x218 > blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x2fc/0x4a0 > __blk_flush_plug+0x70/0x134 > blk_finish_plug+0x24/0x34 > read_pages+0x60/0x158 > page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x98/0x184 > do_page_cache_ra+0x44/0x50 > force_page_cache_ra+0x98/0x9c > page_cache_sync_ra+0x30/0x54 > filemap_get_pages+0xfc/0x4f8 > filemap_read+0xe8/0x2b8 > blkdev_read_iter+0x12c/0x144 > vfs_read+0x104/0x150 > ksys_read+0x6c/0xd4 > __arm64_sys_read+0x14/0x1c > invoke_syscall+0x70/0xf4 > el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0xcc > do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x24 > el0_svc+0x34/0x8c > el0t_64_sync_handler+0x88/0x124 > el0t_64_sync+0x150/0x154 > irq event stamp: 0 > hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 > hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffc08007efa4>] copy_process+0x6ac/0x18d4 > softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffc08007efa4>] copy_process+0x6ac/0x18d4 > softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 > > Reverting this commit, or disabling IOMMU support fixes the issue. Hello Geert, Can you test the following patch? diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c index 8e1d7ed52fef..ebba05a2bc7f 100644 --- a/block/blk-settings.c +++ b/block/blk-settings.c @@ -188,7 +188,10 @@ static int blk_validate_limits(struct queue_limits *lim) * bvec and lower layer bio splitting is supposed to handle the two * correctly. */ - if (!lim->virt_boundary_mask) { + if (lim->virt_boundary_mask) { + if (!lim->max_segment_size) + lim->max_segment_size = UINT_MAX; + } else { /* * The maximum segment size has an odd historic 64k default that * drivers probably should override. Just like the I/O size we thanks Ming ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] block: allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size 2024-04-24 12:41 ` Ming Lei @ 2024-04-24 13:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2024-04-24 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ming Lei Cc: Jens Axboe, linux-block, janpieter.sollie, Christoph Hellwig, Mike Snitzer, dm-devel, Song Liu, linux-raid, linux-renesas-soc, linux-kernel Hi Ming, On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 2:41 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:26:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Apr 2024, Ming Lei wrote: > > > When one stacking device is over one device with virt_boundary_mask and > > > another one with max segment size, the stacking device have both limits > > > set. This way is allowed before d690cb8ae14b ("block: add an API to > > > atomically update queue limits"). > > > > > > Relax the limit so that we won't break such kind of stacking setting. > > > > > > Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218687 > > > Reported-by: janpieter.sollie@edpnet.be > > > Fixes: d690cb8ae14b ("block: add an API to atomically update queue limits") > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/ZfGl8HzUpiOxCLm3@fedora/ > > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > > > Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org> > > > Cc: dm-devel@lists.linux.dev > > > Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> > > > Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> > > > > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit b561ea56a26415bf ("block: > > allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size") in > > v6.9-rc4. > > > > With CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG_SG=y and IOMMU support enabled, this causes a > > warning on R-Car Gen3/Gen4 platforms: > > > > DMA-API: renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee160000.mmc: mapping sg segment longer than device claims to support [len=86016] [max=65536] > > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 281 at kernel/dma/debug.c:1178 debug_dma_map_sg+0x2ac/0x330 > > > > Reverting this commit, or disabling IOMMU support fixes the issue. > > Can you test the following patch? > > > diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c > index 8e1d7ed52fef..ebba05a2bc7f 100644 > --- a/block/blk-settings.c > +++ b/block/blk-settings.c > @@ -188,7 +188,10 @@ static int blk_validate_limits(struct queue_limits *lim) > * bvec and lower layer bio splitting is supposed to handle the two > * correctly. > */ > - if (!lim->virt_boundary_mask) { > + if (lim->virt_boundary_mask) { > + if (!lim->max_segment_size) > + lim->max_segment_size = UINT_MAX; > + } else { > /* > * The maximum segment size has an odd historic 64k default that > * drivers probably should override. Just like the I/O size we Thanks, that works for me (both with/without IOMMU support)! Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-24 13:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20240407131931.4055231-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
2024-04-24 10:26 ` [PATCH] block: allow device to have both virt_boundary_mask and max segment size Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-04-24 12:41 ` Ming Lei
2024-04-24 13:09 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®