From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux+etnaviv@armlinux.org.uk>,
Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
etnaviv@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/etnaviv: Create an accel device node if compute-only
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 19:47:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zn73Hr14DUHfhDz6@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPj87rPnA1eKR_b7gAhDiMZRcVt8xPS9xnsscqVQ_a_qO_tD4A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 08:26:04PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 18:52, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:39:01AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 09:28, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > > > So we are kind of stuck here between breaking one or the other use-
> > > > case. I'm leaning heavily into the direction of just fixing Mesa, so we
> > > > can specify the type of screen we need at creation time to avoid the
> > > > renderonly issue, porting this change as far back as reasonably
> > > > possible and file old userspace into shit-happens.
> > >
> > > Yeah, honestly this sounds like the best solution to me too.
> >
> > Yeah mesa sounds kinda broken here ...
> >
> > What might work in the kernel is if you publish a fake 3d engine that's
> > too new for broken mesa, if that's enough to make it fail to bind? And if
> > mesa still happily binds against that, then yeah it's probably too broken
> > and we need etnaviv-v2 (as a drm driver uapi name, I think that's what
> > mesa filters?) for anything new (including the NN-only ones).
> >
> > I would still try to avoid that, but just in case someone screams about
> > regressions.
>
> It's not just etnaviv, it's literally every Mesa driver which works
> with decoupled render/display. So that would be etnaviv-v2,
> panfrost-v2, panthor-v2, v3d-v2, powervr-v2, ... albeit those don't
> tend to have multiple instances.
So essentially mesa just burns&crashes when old mesa runs on a newer
kernel with support for a chip that mesa doesn't know about?
> Anyway, I'm still leaning towards the answer being: this is not an
> etnaviv regression caused by NPU, it's a longstanding generic Mesa
> issue for which the answer is to fix the known fragility.
If the above is correct, then yes I think we should just fix mesa. Feels
like the breakage is too obviously there, and that's all we'll do unless
the screaming gets too loud.
-Sima
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-28 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 6:37 Tomeu Vizoso
2024-04-25 11:32 ` Christian Gmeiner
2024-04-26 5:36 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2024-04-25 18:59 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2024-04-26 6:10 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2024-05-09 13:53 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2024-05-09 14:41 ` Oded Gabbay
2024-06-26 7:26 ` Daniel Vetter
2024-06-26 8:42 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-06-26 17:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2024-05-10 8:34 ` Lucas Stach
2024-05-20 7:39 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2024-05-20 11:19 ` Daniel Stone
2024-06-12 14:26 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2024-06-17 17:01 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2024-06-26 7:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2024-06-26 8:28 ` Lucas Stach
2024-06-26 10:39 ` Daniel Stone
2024-06-26 17:52 ` Daniel Vetter
2024-06-26 19:26 ` Daniel Stone
2024-06-28 9:43 ` Tomeu Vizoso
2024-06-28 9:54 ` Daniel Stone
2024-06-28 17:47 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2024-05-20 9:24 ` Tomeu Vizoso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zn73Hr14DUHfhDz6@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.gmeiner@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@fooishbar.org \
--cc=daniels@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=etnaviv@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux+etnaviv@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
--cc=tomeu@tomeuvizoso.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®