[GIT PULL] workqueue fixes for v6.11-rc4

[GIT PULL] workqueue fixes for v6.11-rc4

[Tejun Heo]

The following changes since commit 8400291e289ee6b2bf9779ff1c83a291501f017b:

  Linux 6.11-rc1 (2024-07-28 14:19:55 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git/ tags/wq-for-6.11-rc4-fixes

for you to fetch changes up to c4c8f369b6a6d21ce27286de1501137771e01dc3:

  workqueue: Correct declaration of cpu_pwq in struct workqueue_struct (2024-08-05 18:34:02 -1000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
workqueue: Fixes for v6.11-rc4

Nothing too interesting. One patch to remove spurious warning and others to
address static checker warnings.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lai Jiangshan (1):
      workqueue: Remove incorrect "WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&worker->entry));" from dying worker

Nikita Shubin (1):
      workqueue: doc: Fix function name, remove markers

Tejun Heo (1):
      workqueue: Fix spruious data race in __flush_work()

Uros Bizjak (1):
      workqueue: Correct declaration of cpu_pwq in struct workqueue_struct

Will Deacon (1):
      workqueue: Fix UBSAN 'subtraction overflow' error in shift_and_mask()

 Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst |  2 +-
 kernel/workqueue.c                   | 50 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

Re: [GIT PULL] workqueue fixes for v6.11-rc4

[pr-tracker-bot]

The pull request you sent on Fri, 23 Aug 2024 14:44:55 -1000:

> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git/ tags/wq-for-6.11-rc4-fixes

has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/cb2c84b38082f8bd052bf909c7da344b83578ace

Thank you!

-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/prtracker.html

[GIT PULL] workqueue: Fixes for v6.11-rc4

[Tejun Heo]

The following changes since commit 8400291e289ee6b2bf9779ff1c83a291501f017b:

  Linux 6.11-rc1 (2024-07-28 14:19:55 -0700)

are available in the Git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git/ tags/wq-for-6.11-rc4-fixes

for you to fetch changes up to c4c8f369b6a6d21ce27286de1501137771e01dc3:

  workqueue: Correct declaration of cpu_pwq in struct workqueue_struct (2024-08-05 18:34:02 -1000)

----------------------------------------------------------------
workqueue: Fixes for v6.11-rc4

Nothing too interesting. One patch to remove spurious warning and others to
address static checker warnings.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lai Jiangshan (1):
      workqueue: Remove incorrect "WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&worker->entry));" from dying worker

Nikita Shubin (1):
      workqueue: doc: Fix function name, remove markers

Tejun Heo (1):
      workqueue: Fix spruious data race in __flush_work()

Uros Bizjak (1):
      workqueue: Correct declaration of cpu_pwq in struct workqueue_struct

Will Deacon (1):
      workqueue: Fix UBSAN 'subtraction overflow' error in shift_and_mask()

 Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst |  2 +-
 kernel/workqueue.c                   | 50 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

Re: [GIT PULL] workqueue: Fixes for v6.11-rc4

[Linus Torvalds]

On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 at 08:59, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> workqueue: Fixes for v6.11-rc4
>
> Nothing too interesting. One patch to remove spurious warning and others to
> address static checker warnings.

Was there some reason you sent this twice?  Did you perhaps mean to
send a different pull request rather than repeat an earlier one?

                 Linus

Re: [GIT PULL] workqueue: Fixes for v6.11-rc4

[Tejun Heo]

On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 10:44:30AM +0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 at 08:59, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > workqueue: Fixes for v6.11-rc4
> >
> > Nothing too interesting. One patch to remove spurious warning and others to
> > address static checker warnings.
> 
> Was there some reason you sent this twice?  Did you perhaps mean to
> send a different pull request rather than repeat an earlier one?

I was confused. I recently changed my outgoing mail settings (so that they
go through korg and pass DMARC) which made the "from: me" gmail search not
work anymore, so I got confused whether I sent it or not and ended up
resending it. Sorry about that.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun