mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: TAKANO Mitsuhiro <takano32@gmail.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf vendor events arm64 AmpereOneX: Deprecate BPU_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 12:07:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a188c604-46c0-48fb-9cbd-9eacad88b5c9@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103112609.3772250-1-takano32@gmail.com>



On 03/11/2026 11:26, TAKANO Mitsuhiro wrote:
> AmpereOne named event 0x121 BPU_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT until
> commit 10a149e4b4a9 ("perf vendor events arm64 AmpereOne: Rename
> BPU_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT to GPC_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT") renamed it.  The next patch
> in that series, 16438b652b46, added the AmpereOneX tables with the old
> name in memory.json, so 0x121 carries two names: GPC_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT in
> core-imp-def.json and BPU_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT in memory.json, and the
> default perf list output shows both.  The old name has been in every
> release since v6.8, so deleting it would break scripts that use it.
> 
> Mark the entry deprecated instead of deleting it, as Ian Rogers asked:
> perf list then shows 0x121 once while those scripts keep working.  The
> x86 tables use the same wording, and
> commit eda39f98bbc5 ("perf vendor events amd: Reintroduce deprecated
> Zen 5 core events") brought back deprecated AMD events for the same
> reason.  The flag is only read when listing; the entry still registers
> event=0x121, so perf stat -e bpu_flush_mem_fault resolves as before, and
> regenerating the tables changes nothing but that flag.
> perf list --deprecated still prints the name in the text output; the
> JSON path does not consult the flag, so perf list -j cannot show it.
> No metric expression and no other file refers to either name.
> 
> The duplicate came in because jevents checks repeated names, not event
> codes, and one encoding carrying several names is legitimate, so nothing
> is added for that here.  No AmpereOneX machine was available, so the
> listing was not run on hardware; Ilkka Koskinen, who added both tables,
> tried v1 and v2 and reports that they behave as expected, and his
> Acked-by is for this variant.  The JSON edit and this changelog were
> written with an LLM assistant, Hermes Agent, working from the code and
> the thread; the checks above were run here.
> 
> Fixes: 16438b652b46 ("perf vendor events arm64 AmpereOneX: Add core PMU events and metrics")
> Suggested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20261021224527.167637-1-takano32@gmail.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/CAP-5=fX+2eRGCHcU43sqU=gi9iKvxqyS6ipwRSnvFcap3D+QzQ@mail.gmail.com
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/42801873-8908-07a6-aed1-c7076c689e8e@os.amperecomputing.com
> Acked-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Signed-off-by: TAKANO Mitsuhiro <takano32@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: keep the entry and mark it deprecated instead of deleting it,
>      as Ian Rogers suggested, and word both descriptions the way
>      the x86 tables do.  Ilkka Koskinen Acked-by v1 and asked for it
>      to be carried over to v2; the description wording was added on
>      top of that, as said in this thread.
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20261021224527.167637-1-takano32@gmail.com
> 
>   .../perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereonex/memory.json | 5 +++--
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereonex/memory.json b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereonex/memory.json
> index 6c06bc928415..114f95e41e0d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereonex/memory.json
> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/ampere/ampereonex/memory.json
> @@ -35,9 +35,10 @@
>           "ArchStdEvent": "MEM_ACCESS_CHECKED_WR"
>       },
>       {
> -        "PublicDescription": "Flushes due to memory hazards",
> +        "PublicDescription": "This event is deprecated. Refer to new event GPC_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT Flushes due to memory hazards",

Extremely minor nit, but there should be a full stop before 'Flushes'. 
But if marking it deprecated makes it not show in Perf list, then it 
doesn't make a difference.

Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>

>           "EventCode": "0x121",
>           "EventName": "BPU_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT",
> -        "BriefDescription": "Flushes due to memory hazards"
> +        "BriefDescription": "This event is deprecated. Refer to new event GPC_FLUSH_MEM_FAULT",
> +        "Deprecated": "1"
>       }
>   ]
> 
> base-commit: 6628e7d4c6b25c8d18f1345e3a20d21829aae7e4


      reply	other threads:[~2026-11-03 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <42801873-8908-07a6-aed1-c7076c689e8e@os.amperecomputing.com>
2026-11-03 11:26 ` TAKANO Mitsuhiro
2026-11-03 12:07   ` James Clark [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a188c604-46c0-48fb-9cbd-9eacad88b5c9@linaro.org \
    --to=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=takano32@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®