[PATCH] platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix IS_ENABLED() check

[PATCH] platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix IS_ENABLED() check

[Lukas Bulwahn]

From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>

Commit d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with
pmtimer turned off") accidentally slips in some CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER
(note the duplicated CONFIG prefix) in the IS_ENABLED() check.

Fortunately, ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py notices this accident. Fix up
the IS_ENABLED() check with the intended config name.

Fixes: d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with pmtimer turned off")
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
index 0431a599ba26..4387b5103701 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ static int pmc_core_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			       pmc_core_adjust_slp_s0_step(primary_pmc, 1));
 
 	map = primary_pmc->map;
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
 	    map->acpi_pm_tmr_ctl_offset)
 		acpi_pmtmr_register_suspend_resume_callback(pmc_core_acpi_pm_timer_suspend_resume,
 							 pmcdev);
@@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ static void pmc_core_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	const struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[PMC_IDX_MAIN];
 	const struct pmc_reg_map *map = pmc->map;
 
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
 	    map->acpi_pm_tmr_ctl_offset)
 		acpi_pmtmr_unregister_suspend_resume_callback();
 
-- 
2.46.1

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix IS_ENABLED() check

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024, at 08:40, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>
>
> Commit d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with
> pmtimer turned off") accidentally slips in some CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER
> (note the duplicated CONFIG prefix) in the IS_ENABLED() check.
>
> Fortunately, ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py notices this accident. Fix up
> the IS_ENABLED() check with the intended config name.
>
> Fixes: d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with 
> pmtimer turned off")
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>
> ---

Thanks for fixing my typo!

Acked-by; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix IS_ENABLED() check

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

Lukas, thank you for your patch.

On 24-Sep-24 10:40 AM, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>
> 
> Commit d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with
> pmtimer turned off") accidentally slips in some CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER
> (note the duplicated CONFIG prefix) in the IS_ENABLED() check.
> 
> Fortunately, ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py notices this accident. Fix up
> the IS_ENABLED() check with the intended config name.
> 
> Fixes: d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with pmtimer turned off")
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>

I see that d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build
regression with pmtimer turned off") does not exist in
Torvald's tree yet.

This comes from http://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git/log/?h=timers/drivers/next

Daniel, I appreciate you picking this up, but now that everything
has been merged together again in v6.12-rc1 I would prefer to
handle any further changes limited to drivers/platform/x86/intel/
through the pdx86 tree.

Also since this is a build fix it really should be send as a fix
fro the 6.12 cycle.

Daniel judging by the timers/drivers/next branch name I guess these
are not fixes targeting 6.12, right ?

In that case can you please drop d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc:
fix build regression with pmtimer turned off") ?  Then I'll pick that
up and squash in this typo fix.

Or if you do plan to send things out as fixes to Linus, then please
add this patch too.

Regards,

Hans





> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> index 0431a599ba26..4387b5103701 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ static int pmc_core_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			       pmc_core_adjust_slp_s0_step(primary_pmc, 1));
>  
>  	map = primary_pmc->map;
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
>  	    map->acpi_pm_tmr_ctl_offset)
>  		acpi_pmtmr_register_suspend_resume_callback(pmc_core_acpi_pm_timer_suspend_resume,
>  							 pmcdev);
> @@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ static void pmc_core_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	const struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[PMC_IDX_MAIN];
>  	const struct pmc_reg_map *map = pmc->map;
>  
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
>  	    map->acpi_pm_tmr_ctl_offset)
>  		acpi_pmtmr_unregister_suspend_resume_callback();
>  

Re: [PATCH] platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix IS_ENABLED() check

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 24-Sep-24 10:40 AM, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>
> 
> Commit d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with
> pmtimer turned off") accidentally slips in some CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER
> (note the duplicated CONFIG prefix) in the IS_ENABLED() check.
> 
> Fortunately, ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py notices this accident. Fix up
> the IS_ENABLED() check with the intended config name.
> 
> Fixes: d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with pmtimer turned off")
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@redhat.com>

Note the code this modified is being reverted in the pdx86/fixes branch now, see:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/platform-driver-x86/patch/20241012182656.2107178-1-mmaslanka@google.com/

which I have just applied to my review-hans branch and will be in my next pdx86 fixes
PR to Linus.

Daniel, this means that once the next pdx86 fixes PR is merged there will be a conflict
with commit d7a87891e2f5 ("platform/x86:intel/pmc: fix build regression with
pmtimer turned off") from timers/drivers/next. The correct conflict resolution is
to just drop the changes since the code which this patches is removed by the revert.

Since this will now no longer apply I'm dropping this from the pdx86 patch queue.

Regards,

Hans



> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> index 0431a599ba26..4387b5103701 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ static int pmc_core_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  			       pmc_core_adjust_slp_s0_step(primary_pmc, 1));
>  
>  	map = primary_pmc->map;
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
>  	    map->acpi_pm_tmr_ctl_offset)
>  		acpi_pmtmr_register_suspend_resume_callback(pmc_core_acpi_pm_timer_suspend_resume,
>  							 pmcdev);
> @@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ static void pmc_core_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	const struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[PMC_IDX_MAIN];
>  	const struct pmc_reg_map *map = pmc->map;
>  
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER) &&
>  	    map->acpi_pm_tmr_ctl_offset)
>  		acpi_pmtmr_unregister_suspend_resume_callback();
>