* REGRESSION on linux-next (next-20251201)
@ 2025-12-03 9:10 Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-12-03 19:31 ` Aaron Thompson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar @ 2025-12-03 9:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Cc: Kurmi, Suresh Kumar, Saarinen, Jani, intel-gfx, intel-xe,
linux-doc, linux-kernel
Hello Aaron,
Hope you are doing well. I am Chaitanya from the linux graphics team in
Intel.
This mail is regarding a regression we are seeing in our CI runs[1] on
linux-next repository.
Since the version next-20251201 [2], we are seeing the following regression
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Starting subtest: load
(i915_module_load:1280) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure
function igt_debugfs_path, file ../lib/igt_debugfs.c:121:
(i915_module_load:1280) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: debugfs_root
(i915_module_load:1280) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Last errno: 2, No such
file or directory
Subtest load failed.
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
I see some other drivers also failing to create their debugfs entries.
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
[ 0.134437] pinctrl core: failed to create debugfs directory
[ 3.488263] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: Failed to create debugfs entries
[ 3.563494] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.1: Failed to create debugfs entries
[ 3.631076] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: Failed to create debugfs entries
[ 3.697366] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.3: Failed to create debugfs entries
[ 3.764351] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: Failed to create debugfs entries
[ 3.841824] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: Failed to create debugfs entries
[ 3.909492] nvme0: failed to create debugfs directory
[ 3.937845] nvme0n1: failed to create debugfs directory
[ 5.636042] pinctrl core: failed to create debugfs directory for
INTC105E:00
[ 177.973628] cec: Failed to create debugfs cec dir
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Detailed log can be found in [3].
After bisecting the tree, the following patch [4] seems to be the first
"bad" commit
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
commit f278809475f6835b56de78b28dc2cc0c7e2c20a4
Author: Aaron Thompson dev@aaront.org
Date: Thu Nov 20 10:26:33 2025 +0000
debugfs: Remove broken no-mount mode
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
We also verified that if we revert the patch the issue is not seen.
Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide
a fix if necessary?
Thank you.
Regards
Chaitanya
[1]
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/linux-next/combined-alt.html?
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20251201
[3]
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/linux-next/next-20251201/bat-arlh-2/igt@i915_module_load@load.html
[4]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20251201&id=f278809475f6835b56de78b28dc2cc0c7e2c20a4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: REGRESSION on linux-next (next-20251201)
2025-12-03 9:10 REGRESSION on linux-next (next-20251201) Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
@ 2025-12-03 19:31 ` Aaron Thompson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Aaron Thompson @ 2025-12-03 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
Cc: Kurmi, Suresh Kumar, Saarinen, Jani, intel-gfx, intel-xe,
linux-doc, linux-kernel
On 12/3/25 01:10, Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
> Hello Aaron,
>
> Hope you are doing well. I am Chaitanya from the linux graphics team in
> Intel.
>
> This mail is regarding a regression we are seeing in our CI runs[1] on
> linux-next repository.
>
> Since the version next-20251201 [2], we are seeing the following regression
>
> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> Starting subtest: load
> (i915_module_load:1280) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure
> function igt_debugfs_path, file ../lib/igt_debugfs.c:121:
> (i915_module_load:1280) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Failed assertion:
> debugfs_root
> (i915_module_load:1280) igt_debugfs-CRITICAL: Last errno: 2, No such
> file or directory
> Subtest load failed.
> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
>
> I see some other drivers also failing to create their debugfs entries.
>
> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> [ 0.134437] pinctrl core: failed to create debugfs directory
> [ 3.488263] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.0: Failed to create debugfs entries
> [ 3.563494] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.1: Failed to create debugfs entries
> [ 3.631076] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.2: Failed to create debugfs entries
> [ 3.697366] intel-lpss 0000:00:15.3: Failed to create debugfs entries
> [ 3.764351] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.0: Failed to create debugfs entries
> [ 3.841824] intel-lpss 0000:00:19.1: Failed to create debugfs entries
> [ 3.909492] nvme0: failed to create debugfs directory
> [ 3.937845] nvme0n1: failed to create debugfs directory
> [ 5.636042] pinctrl core: failed to create debugfs directory for
> INTC105E:00
> [ 177.973628] cec: Failed to create debugfs cec dir
> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> Detailed log can be found in [3].
>
> After bisecting the tree, the following patch [4] seems to be the first
> "bad" commit
>
> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
> commit f278809475f6835b56de78b28dc2cc0c7e2c20a4
> Author: Aaron Thompson dev@aaront.org
> Date: Thu Nov 20 10:26:33 2025 +0000
>
> debugfs: Remove broken no-mount mode
> `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
>
> We also verified that if we revert the patch the issue is not seen.
>
> Could you please check why the patch causes this regression and provide
> a fix if necessary?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Regards
>
> Chaitanya
>
> [1]
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/linux-next/combined-alt.html?
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/
> commit/?h=next-20251201
> [3]
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/linux-next/next-20251201/bat-arlh-2/
> igt@i915_module_load@load.html
> [4] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/
> commit/?h=next-20251201&id=f278809475f6835b56de78b28dc2cc0c7e2c20a4
Hi Chaitanya,
This is fixed in next-20251203 (commit d3666c1f8a31). For next-20251201
and next-20251202, you can also work around the bug by specifying the
kernel parameter "debugfs=on". Sorry for the inconvenience.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/fs/debugfs?h=next-20251203&id=d3666c1f8a31b7ff6805effcfedfac22454c6517
-- Aaron
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-03 19:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-03 9:10 REGRESSION on linux-next (next-20251201) Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2025-12-03 19:31 ` Aaron Thompson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®