mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] riscv: futex: untag the user pointer before the atomic access
@ 2026-10-01 18:43 Ziyi Guo
  2026-10-05 23:37 ` Samuel Holland
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ziyi Guo @ 2026-10-01 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: palmer, pjw, aou, alex
  Cc: samuel.holland, thecharlesjenkins, linux-riscv, linux-kernel,
	stable, Ziyi Guo

access_ok() checks untagged_addr(uaddr), but arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser()
and futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() hand the raw uaddr to the inline asm
amoswap/amoadd/.../lr.w+sc.w through the "+m" (*uaddr) operand.  When the
tagged address ABI is enabled (CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM, prctl
PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL with PMLEN != 0), those two addresses differ: a
user pointer whose top PMLEN bits hold a tag passes access_ok() after
untagging, but the atomic is then performed on the still-tagged raw
address.

Supervisor-mode data accesses are not subject to the U-mode pointer
masking (that is governed by menvcfg.PMM, which the kernel does not set),
so hardware does not strip the tag for the kernel's own access.  With
Sv57 and PMLEN=16 the tag bits overlap the canonical-address bits, so a
tagged pointer can name a canonical kernel virtual address (e.g. in the
linear map) whose untagged form is a valid user address.  An unprivileged
process can thus make FUTEX_WAKE_OP perform an atomic read-modify-write on
an arbitrary kernel address, with the matching FUTEX_OP_CMP_* result
serving as a read oracle.

get_user()/put_user()/raw_copy_{to,from}_user() already untag the pointer
after the access_ok() check; do the same in the futex helpers so the
atomic operates on the address that was actually validated.

Fixes: 2e1743085887 ("riscv: Add support for the tagged address ABI")
Signed-off-by: Ziyi Guo <guoziyi114@gmail.com>
---
 arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
index 90c86b115e00..8d80e580eec5 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(int op, int oparg, int *oval, u32 __user *uaddr)
 
 	if (!access_ok(uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
 		return -EFAULT;
+	uaddr = untagged_addr(uaddr);   /* FIX: operate on the checked address */
 
 	switch (op) {
 	case FUTEX_OP_SET:
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(u32 *uval, u32 __user *uaddr,
 
 	if (!access_ok(uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
 		return -EFAULT;
+	uaddr = untagged_addr(uaddr);   /* FIX: operate on the checked address */
 
 	__enable_user_access();
 	__asm__ __volatile__ (
-- 
2.34.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] riscv: futex: untag the user pointer before the atomic access
  2026-10-01 18:43 [PATCH] riscv: futex: untag the user pointer before the atomic access Ziyi Guo
@ 2026-10-05 23:37 ` Samuel Holland
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Holland @ 2026-10-05 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ziyi Guo, palmer, pjw, aou, alex
  Cc: thecharlesjenkins, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, stable

On 2026-10-01 8:43 PM, Ziyi Guo wrote:
> access_ok() checks untagged_addr(uaddr), but arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser()
> and futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() hand the raw uaddr to the inline asm
> amoswap/amoadd/.../lr.w+sc.w through the "+m" (*uaddr) operand.  When the
> tagged address ABI is enabled (CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SUPM, prctl
> PR_SET_TAGGED_ADDR_CTRL with PMLEN != 0), those two addresses differ: a
> user pointer whose top PMLEN bits hold a tag passes access_ok() after
> untagging, but the atomic is then performed on the still-tagged raw
> address.
> 
> Supervisor-mode data accesses are not subject to the U-mode pointer
> masking (that is governed by menvcfg.PMM, which the kernel does not set),
> so hardware does not strip the tag for the kernel's own access.  With
> Sv57 and PMLEN=16 the tag bits overlap the canonical-address bits, so a
> tagged pointer can name a canonical kernel virtual address (e.g. in the
> linear map) whose untagged form is a valid user address.  An unprivileged

Thankfully, the combination Sv57 + PMLEN=16 is unlikely to be in use because the
address bit overlap tends to create performance problems.

> process can thus make FUTEX_WAKE_OP perform an atomic read-modify-write on
> an arbitrary kernel address, with the matching FUTEX_OP_CMP_* result
> serving as a read oracle.
> 
> get_user()/put_user()/raw_copy_{to,from}_user() already untag the pointer
> after the access_ok() check; do the same in the futex helpers so the
> atomic operates on the address that was actually validated.

> Fixes: 2e1743085887 ("riscv: Add support for the tagged address ABI")
> Signed-off-by: Ziyi Guo <guoziyi114@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
> index 90c86b115e00..8d80e580eec5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(int op, int oparg, int *oval, u32 __user *uaddr)
>  
>  	if (!access_ok(uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
> +	uaddr = untagged_addr(uaddr);   /* FIX: operate on the checked address */
>  
>  	switch (op) {
>  	case FUTEX_OP_SET:
> @@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(u32 *uval, u32 __user *uaddr,
>  
>  	if (!access_ok(uaddr, sizeof(u32)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
> +	uaddr = untagged_addr(uaddr);   /* FIX: operate on the checked address */

The comments are not necessary. The reason for the change is in the commit log.
With them removed:

Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>

>  
>  	__enable_user_access();
>  	__asm__ __volatile__ (


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-05 23:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-01 18:43 [PATCH] riscv: futex: untag the user pointer before the atomic access Ziyi Guo
2026-10-05 23:37 ` Samuel Holland

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®