mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com>,
	 Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filelock: ignore 'lock' argument to for_each_file_lock()
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 07:08:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2c3e657dc7dd0f1dfe62eb8e9a419909bc33536.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240212112620.1272058-1-arnd@kernel.org>

On Mon, 2024-02-12 at 12:26 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> When CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING is disabled, ceph causes a warning about
> a variable that is only used insode of the for_each_file_lock()
> loop:
> 
> fs/ceph/locks.c: In function 'ceph_count_locks':
> fs/ceph/locks.c:380:27: error: unused variable 'lock' [-Werror=unused-variable]
>   380 |         struct file_lock *lock;
> 
> Rather than working around this in ceph, change the macro definition
> to still contain a reference to the variable in order to shut up the
> warning.
> 
> Fixes: 75cabec0111b ("filelock: add some new helper functions")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/filelock.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/filelock.h b/include/linux/filelock.h
> index aabd4bdf7eba..69290173280a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filelock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filelock.h
> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static inline void locks_wake_up(struct file_lock *fl)
>  {
>  }
>  
> -#define for_each_file_lock(_fl, _head)	while(false)
> +#define for_each_file_lock(_fl, _head)	while((void)_fl, false)
>  
>  static inline void
>  locks_free_lock_context(struct inode *inode)

I had sent a patch early last week for this, but then dropped the ball
on following up. The simpler fix is to just unconditionally define
for_each_file_lock(). It's a macro, so we can just move the "real"
definition outside of the #ifdef.

I'll spin up a patch later today and resend it.

Thanks,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-12 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-12 11:26 Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-12 12:07 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-12 12:08 ` Jeff Layton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a2c3e657dc7dd0f1dfe62eb8e9a419909bc33536.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=tom@talpey.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®