mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Dawei Li <set_pte_at@outlook.com>, "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] block: simplify blksize_bits() implementation
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 02:03:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3c2674b-c2fd-9128-4ea0-0264c0fc1156@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYCP286MB23238842958D7C083D6B67CECA349@TYCP286MB2323.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

On 10/29/2022 10:20 PM, Dawei Li wrote:
> Convert current looping-based implementation into bit operation,
> which can bring improvement for:
> 
> 1) bitops is more efficient for its arch-level optimization.
> 

do you have a quantitative date to prove that ?
Also which arch benefits the most ? is it true for all ?

> 2) Given that blksize_bits() is inline, _if_ @size is compile-time
> constant, it's possible that order_base_2() _may_ make output
> compile-time evaluated, depending on code context and compiler behavior.
> 

patches like this needs to be supported by the quantitative
data, else I've seen reviewers taking an objection ...

either way :-

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>

-ck



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-31  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-30  5:20 Dawei Li
2022-10-30  7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-10-30 14:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-31  2:03 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2022-10-31 13:27 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a3c2674b-c2fd-9128-4ea0-0264c0fc1156@nvidia.com \
    --to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=set_pte_at@outlook.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®