From: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@gmail.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc5-mm1 + all hotfixes -- BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:05:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a44ae5cd0609031005u263aebebr6e53fb59e0153d0a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060903125458.GA21390@elte.hu>
On 9/3/06, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> * Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sorry Andrew. I don't see clues here to help me target the report to
> > a maintainer. I hope this helps.
> >
> > BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!
> > turning off the locking correctness validator.
>
> Miles, could you try the patch below? (Andrew: if this solves Miles'
> problem then i think this is v2.6.18 material too. [The other
> possibility would be some permanent stack-trace entries leak, in which
> case the patch will not help. If that happens then we'll have to debug
> this some more.])
>
> Ingo
>
> ---------------->
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Subject: lockdep: double the number of stack-trace entries
>
> Miles Lane reported the "BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!" message,
> which means that during normal use his system produced enough lockdep
> events so that the 128-thousand entries stack-trace array got exhausted.
> Double the size of the array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> kernel/lockdep_internals.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
> +++ linux/kernel/lockdep_internals.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
> * Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
> * addresses. Protected by the hash_lock.
> */
> -#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES 131072UL
> +#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES 262144UL
>
> extern struct list_head all_lock_classes;
>
>
Ingo, there seemed to be a difference between the file you editted and
the one in Andrew's tree. I remade you patch so it applies cleanly.
I'll test and let you know. One word of caution, I only hit the
problem once and I'm not sure how to trigger the condition. I'll do
my best.
Thanks,
Miles
--- kernel/lockdep_internals.h~ 2006-09-03 09:59:29.000000000 -0700
+++ kernel/lockdep_internals.h 2006-09-03 10:00:55.000000000 -0700
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
* Stack-trace: tightly packed array of stack backtrace
* addresses. Protected by the hash_lock.
*/
-#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES 131072UL
+#define MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES 262144UL
extern struct list_head all_lock_classes;
--
VGER BF report: H 0.0351707
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-03 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-03 3:03 Miles Lane
2006-09-03 4:20 ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-03 12:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-09-03 17:05 ` Miles Lane [this message]
2006-09-03 18:15 ` Miles Lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a44ae5cd0609031005u263aebebr6e53fb59e0153d0a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=miles.lane@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome