[PATCH v4 0/3] pps: improve PREEMPT_RT performance

[PATCH v4 0/3] pps: improve PREEMPT_RT performance

[Michael Byczkowski]

Dear Rodolfo,

This is v4 of the PPS PREEMPT_RT patchset, with the fixe for the
sleeping-in-atomic issue in patch 2/3 as well as the lost indentation
now squashed in.

Changes since v3: - Patch 2/3: fixed lost indentation on pps_kc_event()
call (reported by Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>)

Changes since v2: - Patch 2/3: moved wake_up_interruptible_all() and 
kill_fasync() out of raw_spinlock section to avoid sleeping-in-atomic on
PREEMPT_RT (reported by Nikolaus Buchwitz)

Changes since v2:
- Patch 2/3: moved wake_up_interruptible_all() and kill_fasync() out
 of raw_spinlock section to avoid sleeping-in-atomic on PREEMPT_RT
 (reported by Nikolaus Buchwitz <nb@buchwitz.com>)

Andrew Morton pointed me your way as PPS maintainer. I'm running a
precision NTP time server on a Raspberry Pi 5 with a PREEMPT_RT kernel
and a u-blox ZED-F9P GPS receiver providing PPS via GPIO.

I found three issues in the PPS subsystem that cause unnecessary jitter
under PREEMPT_RT, while being fully backward-compatible with non-RT
kernels:

1. pps-gpio: The IRQ handler is force-threaded on PREEMPT_RT, so the
  PPS timestamp is captured after scheduling delay rather than at
  interrupt entry. Fix: split into a hardirq primary handler (captures
  timestamp only) and a threaded handler (processes the event).

2. pps_device.lock: spinlock_t becomes a sleeping mutex on PREEMPT_RT,
  allowing pps_event() to be preempted mid-update. Fix: convert to
  raw_spinlock_t and move sleeping calls out of the critical section.

3. pps_kc_hardpps_lock: Same issue as (2), in the kernel consumer path
  that calls hardpps(). Fix: convert to DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK.

All three patches are tested on a Raspberry Pi 5 running a 7.0.0-rc6
PREEMPT_RT kernel. On non-RT kernels there is zero behavioral change.

Signed-off-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
Tested-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>

by (3):
  pps: pps-gpio: split IRQ handler into hardirq and threaded parts
  pps: convert pps_device lock to raw_spinlock for PREEMPT_RT
  pps: convert pps_kc_hardpps_lock to raw_spinlock for PREEMPT_RT

 drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/pps/kapi.c             | 18 ++++++++++-------
 drivers/pps/kc.c               | 22 ++++++++++----------
 drivers/pps/pps.c              | 16 +++++++--------
 include/linux/pps_kernel.h     |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.3

[PATCH v4 1/3] pps: pps-gpio: split IRQ handler into hardirq and threaded parts

[Michael Byczkowski]

On PREEMPT_RT, all IRQ handlers are force-threaded. The current
pps_gpio_irq_handler captures the PPS timestamp via pps_get_ts()
inside the handler, but on RT this runs in thread context — after
a scheduling delay that adds variable latency (jitter) to the
timestamp.

Split the handler into a hardirq primary (pps_gpio_irq_hardirq)
that only captures the timestamp, and a threaded handler
(pps_gpio_irq_thread) that processes the event. With
request_threaded_irq(), the primary handler runs in hardirq context
even on PREEMPT_RT, preserving nanosecond timestamp precision.

On non-RT kernels, request_threaded_irq with an explicit primary
handler behaves identically to the previous request_irq call.

Signed-off-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
Tested-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
Tested-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>
---
 drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c b/drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c
index 935da68610c7..f37398fd6b10 100644
--- a/drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c
@@ -35,33 +35,44 @@ struct pps_gpio_device_data {
 	bool capture_clear;
 	unsigned int echo_active_ms;	/* PPS echo active duration */
 	unsigned long echo_timeout;	/* timer timeout value in jiffies */
+	struct pps_event_time ts;	/* timestamp captured in hardirq */
 };
 
 /*
  * Report the PPS event
  */
 
-static irqreturn_t pps_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+/*
+ * Primary hardirq handler — runs in hardirq context even on PREEMPT_RT.
+ * Only captures the timestamp; all other work is deferred to the thread.
+ */
+static irqreturn_t pps_gpio_irq_hardirq(int irq, void *data)
 {
-	const struct pps_gpio_device_data *info;
-	struct pps_event_time ts;
-	int rising_edge;
+	struct pps_gpio_device_data *info = data;
+
+	pps_get_ts(&info->ts);
 
-	/* Get the time stamp first */
-	pps_get_ts(&ts);
+	return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
+}
 
-	info = data;
+/*
+ * Threaded handler — processes the PPS event using the timestamp
+ * captured in hardirq context above.
+ */
+static irqreturn_t pps_gpio_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct pps_gpio_device_data *info = data;
+	int rising_edge;
 
-	/* Small trick to bypass the check on edge's direction when capture_clear is unset */
 	rising_edge = info->capture_clear ?
 		      gpiod_get_value(info->gpio_pin) : !info->assert_falling_edge;
 	if ((rising_edge && !info->assert_falling_edge) ||
 			(!rising_edge && info->assert_falling_edge))
-		pps_event(info->pps, &ts, PPS_CAPTUREASSERT, data);
+		pps_event(info->pps, &info->ts, PPS_CAPTUREASSERT, data);
 	else if (info->capture_clear &&
 			((rising_edge && info->assert_falling_edge) ||
 			(!rising_edge && !info->assert_falling_edge)))
-		pps_event(info->pps, &ts, PPS_CAPTURECLEAR, data);
+		pps_event(info->pps, &info->ts, PPS_CAPTURECLEAR, data);
 	else
 		dev_warn_ratelimited(&info->pps->dev, "IRQ did not trigger any PPS event\n");
 
@@ -210,8 +221,10 @@ static int pps_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	/* register IRQ interrupt handler */
-	ret = request_irq(data->irq, pps_gpio_irq_handler,
-			  get_irqf_trigger_flags(data), data->info.name, data);
+	ret = request_threaded_irq(data->irq,
+			  pps_gpio_irq_hardirq, pps_gpio_irq_thread,
+			  get_irqf_trigger_flags(data) | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+			  data->info.name, data);
 	if (ret) {
 		pps_unregister_source(data->pps);
 		dev_err(dev, "failed to acquire IRQ %d\n", data->irq);
-- 
2.47.3

[PATCH v4 2/3] pps: convert pps_device lock to raw_spinlock for PREEMPT_RT

[Michael Byczkowski]

On PREEMPT_RT, spinlock_t becomes a sleeping mutex, which allows
pps_event() to be preempted mid-update by other RT threads. This
introduces jitter in the PPS event recording path.

Convert pps_device.lock to raw_spinlock_t so the timestamp and
sequence number updates remain non-preemptible on RT.

Move wake_up_interruptible_all() and kill_fasync() outside the
raw_spinlock critical section, as these acquire sleeping locks
on PREEMPT_RT. The lock now protects only the timestamp, sequence
number, and last_ev updates. This is safe because PPS_FETCH waiters
use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() and will re-check after
waking, and kill_fasync() does not require PPS data to be locked
(thanks to Nikolaus Buchwitz <nb@buchwitz.com> for reporting).

On non-RT kernels, raw_spinlock_t compiles to identical code as
spinlock_t — no behavioral change.

Signed-off-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
Tested-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
---
 drivers/pps/kapi.c         | 18 +++++++++++-------
 drivers/pps/pps.c          | 16 ++++++++--------
 include/linux/pps_kernel.h |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pps/kapi.c b/drivers/pps/kapi.c
index 1bf0335a1b41..46d9fe8b8ce9 100644
--- a/drivers/pps/kapi.c
+++ b/drivers/pps/kapi.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct pps_device *pps_register_source(struct pps_source_info *info,
 		pps->info.echo = pps_echo_client_default;
 
 	init_waitqueue_head(&pps->queue);
-	spin_lock_init(&pps->lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_init(&pps->lock);
 
 	/* Create the char device */
 	err = pps_register_cdev(pps);
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ void pps_event(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_event_time *ts, int event,
 
 	timespec_to_pps_ktime(&ts_real, ts->ts_real);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&pps->lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pps->lock, flags);
 
 	/* Must call the echo function? */
 	if ((pps->params.mode & (PPS_ECHOASSERT | PPS_ECHOCLEAR)))
@@ -206,14 +206,18 @@ void pps_event(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_event_time *ts, int event,
 
 	pps_kc_event(pps, ts, event);
 
-	/* Wake up if captured something */
-	if (captured) {
+	if (captured)
 		pps->last_ev++;
-		wake_up_interruptible_all(&pps->queue);
 
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pps->lock, flags);
+
+	/*
+	 * Wake up after releasing the lock: wake_up_interruptible_all()
+	 * and kill_fasync() acquire sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT.
+	 */
+	if (captured) {
+		wake_up_interruptible_all(&pps->queue);
 		kill_fasync(&pps->async_queue, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
 	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pps->lock, flags);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pps_event);
diff --git a/drivers/pps/pps.c b/drivers/pps/pps.c
index c6b8b6478276..ad96425208a1 100644
--- a/drivers/pps/pps.c
+++ b/drivers/pps/pps.c
@@ -103,12 +103,12 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
 	case PPS_GETPARAMS:
 		dev_dbg(&pps->dev, "PPS_GETPARAMS\n");
 
-		spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
+		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
 
 		/* Get the current parameters */
 		params = pps->params;
 
-		spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
 
 		err = copy_to_user(uarg, &params, sizeof(struct pps_kparams));
 		if (err)
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
-		spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
+		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
 
 		/* Save the new parameters */
 		pps->params = params;
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
 		pps->params.assert_off_tu.flags = 0;
 		pps->params.clear_off_tu.flags = 0;
 
-		spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
 
 		break;
 
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
 			return err;
 
 		/* Return the fetched timestamp and save last fetched event  */
-		spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
+		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
 
 		pps->last_fetched_ev = pps->last_ev;
 
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
 		fdata.info.clear_tu = pps->clear_tu;
 		fdata.info.current_mode = pps->current_mode;
 
-		spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
 
 		err = copy_to_user(uarg, &fdata, sizeof(struct pps_fdata));
 		if (err)
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_compat_ioctl(struct file *file,
 			return err;
 
 		/* Return the fetched timestamp and save last fetched event  */
-		spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
+		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
 
 		pps->last_fetched_ev = pps->last_ev;
 
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_compat_ioctl(struct file *file,
 		memcpy(&compat.info.clear_tu, &pps->clear_tu,
 				sizeof(struct pps_ktime_compat));
 
-		spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
 
 		return copy_to_user(uarg, &compat,
 				sizeof(struct pps_fdata_compat)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/pps_kernel.h b/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
index aab0aebb529e..f2fe504071ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct pps_device {
 	void const *lookup_cookie;		/* For pps_lookup_dev() only */
 	struct device dev;
 	struct fasync_struct *async_queue;	/* fasync method */
-	spinlock_t lock;
+	raw_spinlock_t lock;
 };
 
 /*
-- 
2.47.3

[PATCH v4 3/3] pps: convert pps_kc_hardpps_lock to raw_spinlock for PREEMPT_RT

[Michael Byczkowski]

Convert pps_kc_hardpps_lock from spinlock_t to raw_spinlock_t. This
lock is held in pps_kc_event() which calls hardpps(). hardpps() takes
tk_core.lock which is already a raw_spinlock — nesting a sleeping lock
(PREEMPT_RT spinlock_t) over a raw_spinlock is invalid.

The locked section only checks a pointer comparison and calls
hardpps(), both of which are non-sleeping.

On non-RT kernels, raw_spinlock_t compiles to identical code as
spinlock_t — no behavioral change.

Signed-off-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
Tested-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
Tested-by: Calvin Owens <calvin@wbinvd.org>
---
 drivers/pps/kc.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pps/kc.c b/drivers/pps/kc.c
index fbd23295afd7..9c6c024d5083 100644
--- a/drivers/pps/kc.c
+++ b/drivers/pps/kc.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
  */
 
 /* state variables to bind kernel consumer */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
 /* PPS API (RFC 2783): current source and mode for kernel consumer */
 static struct pps_device *pps_kc_hardpps_dev;	/* unique pointer to device */
 static int pps_kc_hardpps_mode;		/* mode bits for kernel consumer */
@@ -36,17 +36,17 @@ static int pps_kc_hardpps_mode;		/* mode bits for kernel consumer */
 int pps_kc_bind(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_bind_args *bind_args)
 {
 	/* Check if another consumer is already bound */
-	spin_lock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
 
 	if (bind_args->edge == 0)
 		if (pps_kc_hardpps_dev == pps) {
 			pps_kc_hardpps_mode = 0;
 			pps_kc_hardpps_dev = NULL;
-			spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
 			dev_info(&pps->dev, "unbound kernel"
 					" consumer\n");
 		} else {
-			spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
 			dev_err(&pps->dev, "selected kernel consumer"
 					" is not bound\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -56,11 +56,11 @@ int pps_kc_bind(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_bind_args *bind_args)
 				pps_kc_hardpps_dev == pps) {
 			pps_kc_hardpps_mode = bind_args->edge;
 			pps_kc_hardpps_dev = pps;
-			spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
 			dev_info(&pps->dev, "bound kernel consumer: "
 				"edge=0x%x\n", bind_args->edge);
 		} else {
-			spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
 			dev_err(&pps->dev, "another kernel consumer"
 					" is already bound\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -78,15 +78,15 @@ int pps_kc_bind(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_bind_args *bind_args)
  */
 void pps_kc_remove(struct pps_device *pps)
 {
-	spin_lock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
 	if (pps == pps_kc_hardpps_dev) {
 		pps_kc_hardpps_mode = 0;
 		pps_kc_hardpps_dev = NULL;
-		spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
 		dev_info(&pps->dev, "unbound kernel consumer"
 				" on device removal\n");
 	} else
-		spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock);
 }
 
 /* pps_kc_event - call hardpps() on PPS event
@@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ void pps_kc_event(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_event_time *ts,
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* Pass some events to kernel consumer if activated */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock, flags);
 	if (pps == pps_kc_hardpps_dev && event & pps_kc_hardpps_mode)
 		hardpps(&ts->ts_real, &ts->ts_raw);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock, flags);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pps_kc_hardpps_lock, flags);
 }
-- 
2.47.3

Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] pps: convert pps_device lock to raw_spinlock for PREEMPT_RT

[Rodolfo Giometti]

On 4/10/26 12:17, Michael Byczkowski wrote:
> On PREEMPT_RT, spinlock_t becomes a sleeping mutex, which allows
> pps_event() to be preempted mid-update by other RT threads. This
> introduces jitter in the PPS event recording path.
> 
> Convert pps_device.lock to raw_spinlock_t so the timestamp and
> sequence number updates remain non-preemptible on RT.
> 
> Move wake_up_interruptible_all() and kill_fasync() outside the
> raw_spinlock critical section, as these acquire sleeping locks
> on PREEMPT_RT. The lock now protects only the timestamp, sequence
> number, and last_ev updates. This is safe because PPS_FETCH waiters
> use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() and will re-check after
> waking, and kill_fasync() does not require PPS data to be locked
> (thanks to Nikolaus Buchwitz <nb@buchwitz.com> for reporting).
> 
> On non-RT kernels, raw_spinlock_t compiles to identical code as
> spinlock_t — no behavioral change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>

Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>

> Tested-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
> ---
>   drivers/pps/kapi.c         | 18 +++++++++++-------
>   drivers/pps/pps.c          | 16 ++++++++--------
>   include/linux/pps_kernel.h |  2 +-
>   3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pps/kapi.c b/drivers/pps/kapi.c
> index 1bf0335a1b41..46d9fe8b8ce9 100644
> --- a/drivers/pps/kapi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pps/kapi.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct pps_device *pps_register_source(struct pps_source_info *info,
>   		pps->info.echo = pps_echo_client_default;
>   
>   	init_waitqueue_head(&pps->queue);
> -	spin_lock_init(&pps->lock);
> +	raw_spin_lock_init(&pps->lock);
>   
>   	/* Create the char device */
>   	err = pps_register_cdev(pps);
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ void pps_event(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_event_time *ts, int event,
>   
>   	timespec_to_pps_ktime(&ts_real, ts->ts_real);
>   
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&pps->lock, flags);
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pps->lock, flags);
>   
>   	/* Must call the echo function? */
>   	if ((pps->params.mode & (PPS_ECHOASSERT | PPS_ECHOCLEAR)))
> @@ -206,14 +206,18 @@ void pps_event(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_event_time *ts, int event,
>   
>   	pps_kc_event(pps, ts, event);
>   
> -	/* Wake up if captured something */
> -	if (captured) {
> +	if (captured)
>   		pps->last_ev++;
> -		wake_up_interruptible_all(&pps->queue);
>   
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pps->lock, flags);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Wake up after releasing the lock: wake_up_interruptible_all()
> +	 * and kill_fasync() acquire sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT.
> +	 */
> +	if (captured) {
> +		wake_up_interruptible_all(&pps->queue);
>   		kill_fasync(&pps->async_queue, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
>   	}
> -
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pps->lock, flags);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(pps_event);
> diff --git a/drivers/pps/pps.c b/drivers/pps/pps.c
> index c6b8b6478276..ad96425208a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pps/pps.c
> +++ b/drivers/pps/pps.c
> @@ -103,12 +103,12 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
>   	case PPS_GETPARAMS:
>   		dev_dbg(&pps->dev, "PPS_GETPARAMS\n");
>   
> -		spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
> +		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
>   
>   		/* Get the current parameters */
>   		params = pps->params;
>   
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
>   
>   		err = copy_to_user(uarg, &params, sizeof(struct pps_kparams));
>   		if (err)
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
>   			return -EINVAL;
>   		}
>   
> -		spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
> +		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
>   
>   		/* Save the new parameters */
>   		pps->params = params;
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
>   		pps->params.assert_off_tu.flags = 0;
>   		pps->params.clear_off_tu.flags = 0;
>   
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
>   
>   		break;
>   
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
>   			return err;
>   
>   		/* Return the fetched timestamp and save last fetched event  */
> -		spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
> +		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
>   
>   		pps->last_fetched_ev = pps->last_ev;
>   
> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
>   		fdata.info.clear_tu = pps->clear_tu;
>   		fdata.info.current_mode = pps->current_mode;
>   
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
>   
>   		err = copy_to_user(uarg, &fdata, sizeof(struct pps_fdata));
>   		if (err)
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_compat_ioctl(struct file *file,
>   			return err;
>   
>   		/* Return the fetched timestamp and save last fetched event  */
> -		spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
> +		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
>   
>   		pps->last_fetched_ev = pps->last_ev;
>   
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_compat_ioctl(struct file *file,
>   		memcpy(&compat.info.clear_tu, &pps->clear_tu,
>   				sizeof(struct pps_ktime_compat));
>   
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
>   
>   		return copy_to_user(uarg, &compat,
>   				sizeof(struct pps_fdata_compat)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pps_kernel.h b/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
> index aab0aebb529e..f2fe504071ed 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct pps_device {
>   	void const *lookup_cookie;		/* For pps_lookup_dev() only */
>   	struct device dev;
>   	struct fasync_struct *async_queue;	/* fasync method */
> -	spinlock_t lock;
> +	raw_spinlock_t lock;
>   };
>   
>   /*


-- 
GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver                          giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems                     phone:  +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming

[PATCH v4b 0/3] pps: improve PREEMPT_RT performance

[Michael Byczkowski]

Dear Rodolfo, Dear Andrew,

This is v4b of the PPS PREEMPT_RT patchset, including your
Acked-by for the  the fixe of the sleeping-in-atomic issue in
patch 2/3 as well as the lost indentation
now squashed in.

Changes since v4b: - Patch 2/3: added Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti
<giometti@enneenne.com>

Changes since v3: - Patch 2/3: fixed lost indentation on pps_kc_event()
call (reported by Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>)

Changes since v2: - Patch 2/3: moved wake_up_interruptible_all() and 
kill_fasync() out of raw_spinlock section to avoid sleeping-in-atomic on
PREEMPT_RT (reported by Nikolaus Buchwitz)

Changes since v2:
- Patch 2/3: moved wake_up_interruptible_all() and kill_fasync() out
of raw_spinlock section to avoid sleeping-in-atomic on PREEMPT_RT
(reported by Nikolaus Buchwitz <nb@buchwitz.com>)

Andrew Morton pointed me your way as PPS maintainer. I'm running a
precision NTP time server on a Raspberry Pi 5 with a PREEMPT_RT kernel
and a u-blox ZED-F9P GPS receiver providing PPS via GPIO.

I found three issues in the PPS subsystem that cause unnecessary jitter
under PREEMPT_RT, while being fully backward-compatible with non-RT
kernels:

1. pps-gpio: The IRQ handler is force-threaded on PREEMPT_RT, so the
PPS timestamp is captured after scheduling delay rather than at
interrupt entry. Fix: split into a hardirq primary handler (captures
timestamp only) and a threaded handler (processes the event).

2. pps_device.lock: spinlock_t becomes a sleeping mutex on PREEMPT_RT,
allowing pps_event() to be preempted mid-update. Fix: convert to
raw_spinlock_t and move sleeping calls out of the critical section.

3. pps_kc_hardpps_lock: Same issue as (2), in the kernel consumer path
that calls hardpps(). Fix: convert to DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK.

All three patches are tested on a Raspberry Pi 5 running a 7.0.0-rc6
PREEMPT_RT kernel. On non-RT kernels there is zero behavioral change.

Signed-off-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
Tested-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>

by (3):
pps: pps-gpio: split IRQ handler into hardirq and threaded parts
pps: convert pps_device lock to raw_spinlock for PREEMPT_RT
pps: convert pps_kc_hardpps_lock to raw_spinlock for PREEMPT_RT

drivers/pps/clients/pps-gpio.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/pps/kapi.c             | 18 ++++++++++-------
drivers/pps/kc.c               | 22 ++++++++++----------
drivers/pps/pps.c              | 16 +++++++--------
include/linux/pps_kernel.h     |  2 +-
5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.3

[PATCH v4 2/3] pps: convert pps_device lock to raw_spinlock for PREEMPT_RT

[Michael Byczkowski]

On PREEMPT_RT, spinlock_t becomes a sleeping mutex, which allows
pps_event() to be preempted mid-update by other RT threads. This
introduces jitter in the PPS event recording path.

Convert pps_device.lock to raw_spinlock_t so the timestamp and
sequence number updates remain non-preemptible on RT.

Move wake_up_interruptible_all() and kill_fasync() outside the
raw_spinlock critical section, as these acquire sleeping locks
on PREEMPT_RT. The lock now protects only the timestamp, sequence
number, and last_ev updates. This is safe because PPS_FETCH waiters
use wait_event_interruptible_timeout() and will re-check after
waking, and kill_fasync() does not require PPS data to be locked
(thanks to Nikolaus Buchwitz <nb@buchwitz.com> for reporting).

On non-RT kernels, raw_spinlock_t compiles to identical code as
spinlock_t — no behavioral change.

Signed-off-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
Acked-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
Tested-by: Michael Byczkowski <by@by-online.de>
---
drivers/pps/kapi.c         | 18 +++++++++++-------
drivers/pps/pps.c          | 16 ++++++++--------
include/linux/pps_kernel.h |  2 +-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pps/kapi.c b/drivers/pps/kapi.c
index 1bf0335a1b41..46d9fe8b8ce9 100644
--- a/drivers/pps/kapi.c
+++ b/drivers/pps/kapi.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct pps_device *pps_register_source(struct pps_source_info *info,
pps->info.echo = pps_echo_client_default;

init_waitqueue_head(&pps->queue);
- spin_lock_init(&pps->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&pps->lock);

/* Create the char device */
err = pps_register_cdev(pps);
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ void pps_event(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_event_time *ts, int event,

timespec_to_pps_ktime(&ts_real, ts->ts_real);

- spin_lock_irqsave(&pps->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pps->lock, flags);

/* Must call the echo function? */
if ((pps->params.mode & (PPS_ECHOASSERT | PPS_ECHOCLEAR)))
@@ -206,14 +206,18 @@ void pps_event(struct pps_device *pps, struct pps_event_time *ts, int event,

pps_kc_event(pps, ts, event);

- /* Wake up if captured something */
- if (captured) {
+ if (captured)
pps->last_ev++;
- wake_up_interruptible_all(&pps->queue);

+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pps->lock, flags);
+
+ /*
+  * Wake up after releasing the lock: wake_up_interruptible_all()
+  * and kill_fasync() acquire sleeping locks on PREEMPT_RT.
+  */
+ if (captured) {
+ wake_up_interruptible_all(&pps->queue);
kill_fasync(&pps->async_queue, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
}
-
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pps->lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pps_event);
diff --git a/drivers/pps/pps.c b/drivers/pps/pps.c
index c6b8b6478276..ad96425208a1 100644
--- a/drivers/pps/pps.c
+++ b/drivers/pps/pps.c
@@ -103,12 +103,12 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
case PPS_GETPARAMS:
dev_dbg(&pps->dev, "PPS_GETPARAMS\n");

- spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);

/* Get the current parameters */
params = pps->params;

- spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);

err = copy_to_user(uarg, &params, sizeof(struct pps_kparams));
if (err)
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
return -EINVAL;
}

- spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);

/* Save the new parameters */
pps->params = params;
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
pps->params.assert_off_tu.flags = 0;
pps->params.clear_off_tu.flags = 0;

- spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);

break;

@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
return err;

/* Return the fetched timestamp and save last fetched event  */
- spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);

pps->last_fetched_ev = pps->last_ev;

@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_ioctl(struct file *file,
fdata.info.clear_tu = pps->clear_tu;
fdata.info.current_mode = pps->current_mode;

- spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);

err = copy_to_user(uarg, &fdata, sizeof(struct pps_fdata));
if (err)
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_compat_ioctl(struct file *file,
return err;

/* Return the fetched timestamp and save last fetched event  */
- spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pps->lock);

pps->last_fetched_ev = pps->last_ev;

@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static long pps_cdev_compat_ioctl(struct file *file,
memcpy(&compat.info.clear_tu, &pps->clear_tu,
sizeof(struct pps_ktime_compat));

- spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pps->lock);

return copy_to_user(uarg, &compat,
sizeof(struct pps_fdata_compat)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/pps_kernel.h b/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
index aab0aebb529e..f2fe504071ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/pps_kernel.h
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct pps_device {
void const *lookup_cookie; /* For pps_lookup_dev() only */
struct device dev;
struct fasync_struct *async_queue; /* fasync method */
- spinlock_t lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
};

/*
-- 
2.47.3