mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, karthik@techveda.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: cpufreq: Fix sysfs duplicate filename creation for platform-device
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:46:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4ac9c9c-c362-5df4-6876-121c82b37087@techveda.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170919223645.GD30848@ubuntu>

On Wednesday 20 September 2017 04:06 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 19-09-17, 10:12, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On 09/18/2017 02:18 PM, sunil.m@techveda.org wrote:
>>> From: Suniel Mahesh <sunil.m@techveda.org>
>>>
>>> ti-cpufreq and cpufreq-dt-platdev drivers are registering platform-device
>>> with same name "cpufreq-dt" using platform_device_register_*() routines.
>>> This is leading to build warnings appended below.
>>>
>>> Providing hardware information to OPP framework along with the platform-
>>> device creation should be done by ti-cpufreq driver before cpufreq-dt
>>> driver comes into place.
>>>
>>> This patch add's TI SoC am33xx (uses opp-v2 property) in the blacklist of
>>> devices in cpufreq-dt-platform driver to avoid creating platform-device
>>> twice and remove build warnings (suggested by Viresh Kumar).
>>
>> This looks good to me, but this also affects "ti,am43" and "ti,dra7" platforms,
>> care to add those to the blacklist as well with this patch? Thanks.

Thanks and will also add those platforms.
 
> 
> Also please rebase on top of the pm/linux-next branch as I have pushed
> a similar patch there. (Actually its applied to pm/bleeding-edge
> branch for now and may take a day to get to pm/linux-next. You can
> wait in that case.).
> 

Will check both pm/linux-next and pm/bleeding-edge branches, will wait 
in that case and then rebase. Thanks

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-20  4:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-16 18:34 [PATCH] " sunil.m
2017-09-18  1:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-09-18 16:59   ` Suniel Mahesh
2017-09-18 19:18   ` [PATCH v2] " sunil.m
2017-09-19 15:12     ` Dave Gerlach
2017-09-19 22:36       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-09-20  4:16         ` Suniel Mahesh [this message]
2017-09-21 13:39         ` [PATCH v3] " sunil.m
2017-09-21 17:53           ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4ac9c9c-c362-5df4-6876-121c82b37087@techveda.org \
    --to=sunil.m@techveda.org \
    --cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=karthik@techveda.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®